Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2020 (1) TMI 292

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....6/-. The Assessing Officer (AO) made a reference to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) for determining the Arm's Length Price (ALP) of the international transactions. The TPO accepted the international transaction in question at ALP and did not recommend any transfer pricing adjustment. The AO, vide his order dated 14-03-2016 passed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 92CA(4) of the Act observed that the assessee debited Software Maintenance charges at Rs. 6.86 crore, which amount was about 400% higher in comparison with the preceding year, in which such Software charges stood at Rs. 1.67 crore. The assessee was called upon to give the details of the expenses and further comments as to why no deduction of tax at source was made from such payment. The assessee justified increase in Software services cost by stating that earlier it was using only Ocean Agents Accounting and Reporting Financial Tool provided by CMA CGM, France, its Associated Enterprise (AE) and from this year, it started using two more new Business Reporting tools, viz., LARA and DIVA provided by its AE. On the question as to why no deduction of tax at source was made, the assessee submitted that the amount was not covered either....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... on the payment of Rs. 6.85 crore and odd made to its AE, namely, CMA CGM, France. Whereas the case of the assessee is that no deduction of tax at source was warranted, the Revenue has set up a case that the amount was chargeable to tax in India in the hands of the CMA CGM, France and hence the assessee was obliged to deduct tax at source. The rival contentions can be properly appreciated by firstly examining the nature of services availed by the assessee under the respective Agreements for using these Software, namely, LARA & DIVA on one hand and the Ocean on the other. 5. In so far as services under LARA & DIVA are concerned, both were provided to the assessee under 'Lara and Diva IT Agreement' dated 23-12-2011 effective from 01-01-2011, a copy of which has been placed at page 130 onwards of the paper book. Preamble of the LARA and DIVA IT Agreement states that: 'CMA CGM (i.e. the French AE) is a company acting in the maritime transport which operates a fleet of vessels (and notably container ships) over worldwide shipping lines and whereas in order to pursue its business activity, CMA CGM has appointed an international network of agencies in order to render shipping....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....toring tools. The tools provided under DIVA are : - Booking Forecasts - Operational list of loading, discharge and transshipment - Controlling Reports on Freighting and Invoicing - Control report of Detention and Demurrage - Report for disbursement account checking - Logistics and Tracking reports - Productivity, quality and performance monitoring - Sales activity and commercial reporting 7. On an overview of the relevant clauses of the LARA and DIVA IT Agreement, it is palpable that LARA and DIVA applications are meant for use by different entities of the CMA CGM all over the world so as to facilitate the business operations of CMA CGM group, which are confined to shipping. These two applications are basically aimed at facilitating the shipping business operations of the assessee and CMA CGM, France. 8. Now we turn to the other Agreement for use of Ocean IT System. A copy of such Agreement has been placed at page 141 onwards of the paper book. Preamble of the Ocean IT System Agreement is on the same lines as that of the LARA and DIVA Agreement. It also provides that CMA CGM is a company acting in the maritime transport and as such operates a fleet of freighters a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hapter XVII-B and such tax has not been deducted or, after deduction, has not been paid on or before the due date specified in sub-section (1) of section 139. Section 195 of the Act provides that any person responsible for paying to a non-resident, not being a company, or to a foreign company, any interest or any other sum chargeable under the provisions of this Act (not being income chargeable under the head "Salaries") shall, at the time of credit of such income to the account of the payee or at the time of payment thereof in cash or by the issue of a cheque or draft or by any other mode, whichever is earlier, deduct income-tax thereon at the rates in force. Instantly, we are not concerned with any interest payment by the assessee to CMA CGM, France. Thus, section 195 will be attracted only on the assessee paying to CMA CGM, France any 'sum chargeable under the provisions of this Act'. When we read section 40(a)(i) in juxtaposition to section 195, the position which emerges is that the liability for deduction of tax at source in the hands of the assessee will arise only when the sum paid to CMA CGM, France is chargeable to tax in India in its hands. In case the amount is ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s is applicable to CMA CGM, France, dealing with 'Shipping' income, as under :- '1. Profits derived by an enterprise of a Contracting State from the operation of ships in international traffic shall be taxable only in that Contracting State. 2. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 1, such profits may be taxed in the other Contracting State from which they are derived provided that the tax so charged shall not exceed : (a) during the first five fiscal years after the entry into force of this Convention, 50 per cent, and (b) during the subsequent five fiscal years, 25 per cent, of the tax otherwise imposed by the internal law of that Contracting State. Subsequently, only the provisions of paragraph 1 shall be applicable. 3. ..... 4. For the purposes of this article interest arising on funds connected with the operation of ships in international traffic shall be regarded as profits derived from the operation of such ships, and the provisions of Article 12 shall not apply in relation to such interest.' 14. Para 1 of the DTAA states that the profits derived by an enterprise of a Contracting State (France) from the operation of ships in international t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... mainly aimed at facilitating its shipping business. If that be the position, then the amount received by CMA CGM, France from the assessee will assume the character of profit derived from the operation of ships as it is inextricably linked with its shipping activity. 17. The Mumbai Bench of the Tribunal in A.P. Moller Maersk v. DDIT (IT) [2013] 33 taxmann.com 44 (Mumbai) (Trib.)considered a case in which the assessee, a non-resident, was engaged in the business of shipping. In the course of its international shipping business, the assessee received certain amount from MIPL, LIL and SIPL on account of cost shared cost of global tracking system which was considered as linked to the shipping income. The AO held such amount to be Royalty/Fees for technical services. The Tribunal upheld the action of the CIT(A) in treating the amount as profit derived from operation of ships. Eventually, when this matter came up before the Hon'ble Supreme Court in DIT v. A.P. Moller Maersk [2017] 392 ITR 186 (SC), their Lordships held that the High Court was correct in holding that the income from the use of Global Telecommunication Facility called 'Maersk Net' was income arising out of sh....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....held that the amount paid/payable by the assessee on this count is royalty and fees for technical services under the Act and the DTAA does not come to the rescue of the assessee. 21. On going through the above clauses of the Agreements for which the assessee paid Software Maintenance charges, it emerges that two types of services were availed by the assessee. First and the foremost is the assistance in carrying out the business operations, such as, in sales, quotation/booking, container tracking, export import documentation and disbursements of accounts. The second, which is a small part of the overall amount, concerns with the maintenance of the information system of LARA & DIVA and Ocean. The authorities below have held that the amount paid by the assessee is not only 'royalty' towards use of software but also 'fees for technical services'. Impliedly they have referred to the payment made towards maintenance of software as 'fees for technical services' and for carrying out other business operations, as 'Royalty'. 22. Section 9(1)(vi) of the Act deals with taxation of income by way of 'royalty'. It provides that the 'royalty' will ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....a future provision would make the income chargeable to tax retrospectively in the hands of the payee thereby mandating it to deduct tax at source. Even if this insertion is retrospective, it cannot take the hands of clock back in time in so far as the deduction of tax at source is concerned since the time for deduction of tax at source stood expired before the insertion of the Explanation 4. With the retrospective insertion of the Explanation 4 by the Finance Act, 2012, the amount may become chargeable to tax in the hands of the recipient subject to other provisions, but certainly it cannot cast an obligation on the payer to deduct tax at source during the period in which the Explanation 4 was actually not there on the statute. It is axiomatic that law cannot require an impossible to be complied with. Resultantly, it is held that the retrospective insertion of Explanation 4 to section 9(1)(vi) cannot necessitate tax withholding during the period when the provision was actually not a part of the enactment, so as to warrant disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) of the Act. 25. At this stage, it would be relevant to note that section 90(1) of the Act provides that the Central Government may ente....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... in the Article 13, which is as under:- 3. The term "royalties" as used in this article means payments of any kind received as a consideration for the use of, or the right to use, any copyright of literary, artistic or scientific work including cinematograph films, or films or tapes used for radio or television broadcasting, any patent, trade mark, design or model, plan, secret formula or process, or for information concerning industrial, commercial or scientific experience. 4. The term "fees for technical services" as used in this Article means payments of any kind to any person, other than payments to an employee of the person making the payments and to any individual for independent personal services mentioned in Article 15, in consideration for services of a managerial, technical or consultancy nature. 28. Para 3 of Article 13 clearly provides that the term 'Royalties' means a consideration for the use of or the right to use any copyright of literary, artistic or scientific work etc. What is relevant in the phraseology of para 3 is that in order to qualify as 'Royalties' under the DTAA, it is necessary that the payment should be a consideration for use of a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....assessee in not sub-licensing the software, which were to be used for its sole business needs. In other words, the consideration was for the use of software for its own business purpose and not for the use of, or the right to use, any copyright of software. As the consideration payable by the assessee for use of LARA, DIVA and Ocean was only for the use of the software for its own business purpose and not having right to copyright, the same will not constitute 'Royalties' within Article 13(3) of the DTAA. 32. Even if for a moment, we presume that the amount is chargeable to tax in the hands of the CMA CGM, France as royalty u/s 9(1)(vi) of the Act with the assistance of Explanation 4, as urged by the ld. DR, the same would escape taxation in terms of the DTAA because the parallel of Explanation 4 to section 9(1)(vi) is not a part of the DTAA. We have noted above that on the plain language of section 9(1)(vi) de hors the effect of Explanation 4, the consideration does not fall in the realm of 'royalty'. 33. Now we turn to the 'Maintenance charges' of the software paid by the assessee, which have been impliedly treated by the authorities below as 'fees f....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....then such limited scope shall stand substituted in the DTAA with France. Portuguese Republic is a member of the OECD with which Indian has entered into a DTAA on 30.4.2000. The term 'fees for included services' has been defined in the Article 12(4) of the DTAA between India and Portuguese, which reads as under : - 'For the purposes of this Article "fees for included services" means payments of any kind, other than those mentioned in Articles 14 and 15 of this Convention, to any person in consideration of the rendering of any technical or consultancy services (including through the provisions of services of technical or other personnel) if such services: (a) are ancillary and subsidiary to the application or enjoyment of the right, property or information for which a payment described in paragraph 3 is received, or .... (b) make available technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or processes or consist of the development and transfer of a technical plan or technical design which enables the person acquiring the services to apply the technology contained therein.' 38. The ld. CIT(A) has discussed this aspect on page 22 onwards of the impugned order. He ....