1993 (4) TMI 327
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he railway establishments are the railway employees and they are entitled to be treated as such. In other respects, this Court had not granted relief to other non-statutory employees while the writ petitions were pending. The petitioners' association representing the persons appointed by the commission vendors on the railway platforms on the various places also claime parity to be treated as r....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... of the Court of Khan case', Madhavan case2 was referred as having being covered. Accordingly, it was ordered thus : "There will be an order as in Madhavan v. Union of India2." Thus this Court was led to believe that the law holding the field is Madhavan's ratio (a two-Judge Bench) instead of Khan's ratio (three Judge-Bench) a binding precedent. Therefore what is prevailing law is the ....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI