Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1993 (1) TMI 29

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....961, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has referred the following question at the instance of the Revenue : "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was justified in capitalising the expenditure of Rs. 86,799 and allowing depreciation and development rebate thereon ?" The assessee is a firm. The assessment year is 1966-67 and the relevant previous y....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd legal charges. The Revenue took up the matter before the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal and contended that Rs. 86,799 could not have been capitalised. In this connection, reliance was placed on the decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in the case of CIT v. Challapalli Sugars Ltd. [1970] 77 ITR 392. The Tribunal, however, following the decision of the Calcutta High Court in the case of CI....