2019 (12) TMI 648

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... appellant Mrs. D. S. Sangeetha, Jt. Commissioner (AR) .....for the Respondent ORDER The present appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 4.12.2018 passed by the Commissioner (A), whereby the Commissioner (A) has rejected the appeal of the appellant. 2. Briefly the facts of the present case are that the appellants are registered as service providers under the category of 'St....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er the provisions of Para 2(h) of Notification No.27/2012-CE (NT) dated 18.6.2012 read with Section 142(4) of the CGST Act, 2017. Aggrieved by the Order-in-Original, appellant filed appeal before the Commissioner (A), who rejected the appeal. Hence, the present appeal. 3. Heard both the parties and perused the records. 4. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the impugned order is....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....plicable only during the period prior to GST regime since GST was done away with the filing of the ST-3 returns. Further, they have submitted that there was no procedure in ACES System to debit the value of refund claim in the Cenvat account during the relevant period. Learned counsel also referred to CBIC Circular No.58/32/2018-GST dated 4.9.2018 wherein the Board itself had clarified that the re....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of debiting the CENVAT account, they have fulfilled the conditions of the Notification and thereby become entitled to the refund on that date. 5. On the other hand, the learned AR defended the impugned order. 6. After considering the submissions of both the parties and perusal of the material on record, I find that the appellant have reversed the CENVAT credit in their CENVAT credit account ....