2012 (3) TMI 643

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s. 18,03,522/- made by the AO on account of short term capital general in nature and does not require any adjudication. On sale of land on which the assessee had already claimed exemption u/s 54B and subsequently the assessee had also sold the new asset within thirty six months of its purchase. 2. The appellant craves to add or amend the ground of appeal on or before the appeal is heard and disposed off. 3. It is prayed that the order of the ld. CIT(A) be set aside and that of the AO be restored." 3. We have carefully perused the rival submissions, facts of the case and relevant record. In this case, the assessee sold his agricultural land at Sanour on 16.2.2006 for Rs. 18,03,522/-. During the financial year 2003-04 rel....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....re not in consonance with the expressed provisions of the Act and, hence, cannot be sustained. In view of this, the findings of the ld. CIT(A) are upheld. Relevant portion of the findings of the ld. CIT(A) are reproduced hereunder:  "16.4 I have considered the submissions of the ld 'AR'. During the year the assessee has sold land at Sanour on 16.2.2006 for Rs. 18,03,522/- and computed the capital loss of Rs. 1,88,450/- as noted in the assessment order. During the financial year 2003-04 relevant to the AY 2004-05 the ae sold 7 bigha 5 biswas agricultural land for Rs. 28.00 lakhs and claimed deduction u/s 54B of the Act as the assessee purchased new agricultural land at Sanour. However, the assessee has sold the same San....