2019 (12) TMI 495
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ssuing notice u/s 154/155 of the Act dated 07/07/2017 on the basis of DVO report received subsequent to passing of assessment order u/s 143(3) of the Act dated 27/12/2016 and in passing order u/s 154 of the Act dated 22/08/2017. 2. That on the law and in the facts and circumstances of the case the ld. Lower authorities grossly erred in calculation long term capital gain at Rs. 75,25,770/- as against Rs. 14,71,577/- adopted by the assessee. 2.1 That on the law and in the facts and in the circumstances of the case the ld. Lower authorities grossly erred in adopting the fair market value of the property as at 01/04/1981 at Rs. 1,57,000/- as against Rs. 8,01,749/- adopted by the assessee. 3. The appellant craves leave to add, alter, modify or amend any ground on or before the date of hearing." The assessee has also raised additional ground, which reads as under: "That the ld. A.O. grossly erred in referring the matter to the ld. Departmental Valuation Officer u/s 55A of the Act which was beyond the scope of Limited Scrutiny Assessment and thus entire action is bad in law, nullity and void and deserves to be quashed and set aside." 2. We have he....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....) CBS International Projects Pvt. Ltd. Vs CIT dated 28/02/2019 passed by the Hon'ble ITAT, New Delhi. (ii) Sarvajit Bhatia Vs ITO, Faridabad dated 21/08/2019 passed by the Hon'ble ITAT, New Delhi. (iii) Shri Vijay Kumar Vs ITO, Patiala dated 12/09/2019 passed by ITAT, Chandigarh. (iv) Lokesh Sadashiv Shetty Vs ITO, Ahmednagar, dated 20/02/2019 passed by ITAT, Pune. 5. On the other hand, the ld DR has submitted that when the scrutiny assessment was taken up on the issue of sale consideration of the property sold by the assessee as well as the deductions claimed by the assessee under Chapter-IV of the Act then the determination of the fair market value of the property is very much within the scope of scrutiny assessment. 6. We have considered the rival submissions as well as relevant material on record. There is no dispute that the case of the assessee was selected for limited scrutiny under CASS and the scope of limited scrutiny is discernable from the notice issued U/s 142(1) dated 07/04/2016 as under: "Specific queries raised, for which information to be furnished: Your ITR has been selected for LIMITED scrutiny under CASS for the follo....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....idered relevant instructions issued by the CBDT for limited scrutiny under CASS and held in para 13 to 16 as under: "13. CBDT Instruction No. 20/2015 is as under: "Scrutiny Assessments-some important issues and scope of scrutiny in cases selected through Computer Aided Scrutiny Selection ('CASS')-reg. The Central Board of Direct Taxes ('CBDT'), vide Instruction No.7/2014 dated 26.09.2014 had clarified the extent of enquiry in certain category of cases specified therein, which are selected for scrutiny through CASS. Further clarifications have been sought regarding the scope and applicability of the aforesaid Instruction to cases being scrutinized. 2. In order to facilitate the conduct of scrutiny assessments and to bring further clarity on some of the issues emerging from the aforesaid Instruction, following clarifications are being made: i. Year of applicability: As stated in the Instruction No.7/2014, the said Instruction is applicable only in respect of the cases selected for scrutiny through CASS-2014. ii. Whether the said Instruction is applicable to all cases selected under CASS: The said Instruction is applicable where th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... being satisfied about merits of the issue(s) necessitating 'Complete Scrutiny' in that particular case. Such cases shall be monitored by the Range Head concerned. The procedure indicated at points (a), (b) and (c) above shall no longer remain binding in such cases. (For the present purpose, 'Metro charges' would mean Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai, Kolkata, Bengaluru, Hyderabad and Ahmedabad). 4. The Board further desires that in all cases under scrutiny, where the Assessing Officer proposes to make additions or disallowances, the assessee would be given a fair opportunity to explain his position on the proposed additions/disallowances in accordance with the principle of natural justice. In this regard, the Assessing Officer shall issue an appropriate show-cause notice duly indicating the reasons for the proposed additions/disallowances along with necessary evidences/reasons forming the basis of the same. Before passing the final order against the proposed additions/disallowances, due consideration shall be given to the submissions made by the assessee in response to the show-cause notice. 5. The contents of this Instruction should be immediately brought to the notice of....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....spects only. Therefore, in such cases, an Assessing Officer hall confine the questionnaire and subsequent enquiry or verification only to these specific point(s) on the basis of which the particular return has been selected for scrutiny. 3. The reason(s) for selection of cases under CASS are displayed to the Assessing Officer in AST application and notice u/s 143(2), after genera ion from AST, is issued to the taxpayer with the remark 'Selected under Computer Aided Scrutiny Selection (CASS)". The functionality in AST is being modified suitably to flag the reasons for scrutiny selection in AIR/CIB/26AS cases. This functionality is expected to be operationalised by 15th October, 2014. Further, the Assessing Officer while issuing notice under section 142(1) of the Act which is enclosed with the first questionnaire would proceed to verify only the specific aspects requiring examination/verification. In such cases, all efforts would be mad to ensure that assessment proceedings are completed expeditiously in minimum possible number of hearings without unnecessarily dragging the case till the time-baring date. 4. In case, during the course of assessment proceedings i....
TaxTMI