2014 (12) TMI 1354

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... For the Opponent : MR KM PARIKH, ADVOCATE ORAL JUDGMENT (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI) 1. By way of this appeal, the appellantassessee has challenged the judgment and order dated 05.09.2002 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal [ for short "the Tribunal"] in ITA No. 1493/Ahd/1996, whereby the appeal filed by the assessee was partly allowed by the Tribunal. 2. The facts....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ile admitting this appeal on 17.02.2003, the Court had formulated the following substantial question of law:- "Does the Income derived from an industrial undertaking include income from service/maintenance contracts in respect of the goods manufactured and supplied by the industrial undertaking so as to be eligible for deduction under section 80I of the Income Tax Act" ? 4. Mr. Shah, l....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....xcel Industries Ltd., reported in [2013] 358 ITR 296] and the decision of the Bombay High Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax v. International Date Management Ltd., reported in [2003] 261 ITR 177. 5. Learned advocate for the respondentrevenue has supported the impugned judgment and order of the Tribunal and submitted that the Tribunal after appreciating the material on record has pa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n the case of CIT Vs. Buckau Wolk New India Engg. Works, reported in 160 ITR 180..." 7. The Apex Court in the case of Excel Industries Ltd. (supra) held that in several assessment Years, the Department accepted the order of the Tribunal in favour of the assesse and did not pursue the matter any further but in respect of some assessment years the matter was taken up in appeal before the High Cou....