2019 (11) TMI 1135

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....72/- in Profit and Loss account which have been rejected by the Ld. CIT(A) which is contrary to law and facts. 4. That the Ld. CIT(A) has wrongly rejected the appeal of the assessee on account of payment of Rs. 5,91,175/- regarding credit card payment which is highly arbitrary and unjust. It is prayed that the addition be deleted." 2. The aforesaid appeal was earlier fixed for hearing on 01.08.2019 by sending the notice through RPAD and in response to the same, none appeared on behalf of the assessee nor filed any application for adjournment. Therefore, the Bench adjourn the case for 06.11.2019 by directing the Registry to issue notice by RPAD for hearing on 06.11.2019. On 06.11.2019 when the matter came up for hearing, again none a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... same in the P&L account and also asked as to why it should not be treated as unexplained cash credit u/s. 68 of the Act. In response to the same, assessee filed a letter dated 14.12.2019 and filed its reply which the AO has reproduced in the assessment order. 3.1 According to the assessment order, assessee has accepted his mistake and agreed for addition of Rs. 8,80,406/-. Accordingly, an addition of Rs. 8,80,406/- was made in the hands of the assessee and AO also initiated the penalty proceedings u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act. 3.2 As regards the ICICI Bank Credit Card, assessee submitted his letter dated 10.8.2015 and stated that assessee had been using ICICI bank credit card which was being shown in his balance sheet but from this year t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ty proceedings u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act. 3.4 After scrutinizing the case of the assessee, the AO found that the assessee has shown addition of fixed assets in the form of computer amounting to Rs. 2,95,680/- and assessee has produced some bills which the AO has reproduced in the assessment order. After perusing the said bills, the AO was of the view that assessee has furnished two bogus bills amounting to Rs. 76,000/- and Rs. 73,680/- pertaining to Kuldeep Computers and SL Computers and printers and these two computers bills dated 1.6.2015 and 15.7.2015 does not pertain to the year under consideration. Assessee has claimed depreciation of Rs. 89,808/- on the same @60%. So, the expenses of Rs. 1,49,680/- as well as depreciation of Rs. 89,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ns mentioned by the revenue authorities especially the Ld. First Appellate Authority for confirming the addition of Rs. 20,38,472/- on account of interest on loan of Rs. 1,11,73,554/-. Hence, no interference is called for in the well reasoned order of the Ld. CIT(A) on the issue in dispute, therefore, I uphold the finding of the Ld. CIT(A) on the issue in dispute and reject the ground raised by the assessee. 4.1 As regards addition of Rs. 5,90,175/- on account of credit card payment is concerned, after going through the orders passed by the revenue authorities and after hearing the Ld. DR, I am of the view that expenses on ICICI Credit Card and the credit facility from Phoenix ARC Pvt. Ltd. was transferred by the assessee to his capital a....