1993 (7) TMI 66

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., the following two questions of law have been referred by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench, for the decision of this court : "1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was justified in cancelling the assessment ? 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the regular assessment for the assessment year 1970-71 is ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cancelled the order of assessment based on its earlier order. In second appeal by the Revenue, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal followed its earlier orders in 1. T. A. Nos. 226 to 231/(Coch) of 1976-77 and I. T. A. No. 826/(Coch) of 1976-77 dated February 28, 1978, for the assessment year 1969-70 and held that no assessment could be made on the assessee treating it as the agent of the non-residen....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....icals (Travancore) Ltd. [1987] 166 ITR 823. This court held that the Tribunal did not consider the question whether the assessee had any business connection with the non-resident so as to treat him as an agent of the non-resident under section 163 of the Income-tax Act. It was further held that, only on deciding this issue, the question whether the orders passed by the Income-tax Officer under sec....