Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2019 (11) TMI 761

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n stage itself. 2. This writ petition is filed challenging the notice dated 27.03.2019 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 2012-2013. 3. Heard Mr.Percy J.Pardivala, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mrs.Hema Muralikrishnan, learned Senior standing counsel appearing for the respondents. 4. Since the issue involved in this case lies in a narrow compass and that the said issue can be considered and decided without a counter pleadings, based on the submission made by the learned Senior standing counsel for the respondents, this Court is inclined to dispose the writ petition itself at the admission stage. 5. For the assessment year 2012-2013, a notice dated 27.03.2019 un....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ofits using such transactions. On receipt of such communication, the petitioner through communication dated 13.08.2019, sought further time to give reply/objections. Again on 27.08.2019, the petitioner sent a detailed communication to the Assessing Officer requesting him to dispose the objections already filed by them in respect of the reason No.1 and also to provide a reasonable time for responding to the reason No.2. It is stated that the petitioner has already sought for certain details from the Assessing Officer including the statements said to have been obtained from two employees of the petitioner-Company, which were relied on by the Assessing Officer for issuing second reason for reopening. Therefore, it is contended by the learne....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed some information and for which purpose, they have already made a request before the Assessing Officer on 27.08.2019 and that the said request is yet to be considered by the Assessing Officer. 8. This Court at this stage is not expressing any view on the merits of such claim made by the petitioner through communication dated 27.08.2019, since it is for the Assessing Officer to consider and decide the same. Admittedly, the said request of the petitioner is yet to be disposed of. Therefore, this Court is inclined to dispose the present writ petition without touching upon the merits of the claim made by the petitioner against reopening only with a direction to the Assessing Officer to pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance wi....