Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (11) TMI 590

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... challenges the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 30 June 2016. The relevant assessment year is 2007-08. The following questions of law are urged for our consideration :- "1. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon'ble ITAT was justified in deleting the addition of Rs. 5,18,44,700/- u/s. 68 of the I.T. Act, 1961 on account of share application....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Officer, during the assessment proceedings, noted that in the relevant previous year the Respondent had received an amount of Rs. 81244700/- from one Mushtaq Ahmed Vakil as share application money. The Respondent allotted 2421788 shares to Shri Vakil. The Assessing Officer treated the amount shown as a share application money as unexplained cash credit and issued a show cause to the Assessee. The....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... impugned assessment year. The Commissioner accordingly directed the Assessing Officer to take necessary action if required. In respect of the remaining amount of Rs. 2.94 crores, the Commissioner observed that sufficient evidence was produced in respect of the identity and genuineness of the share application money and of Shri Vakil and accordingly deleted the said addition. 4. The Appellant - R....