Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (11) TMI 570

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....spondent. ORDER This appeal is directed against order of the Commissioner (Appeals) whereby the penalty under Section 112(a) for Rs. 5 lakh and for Rs. 5 Lakhs under Section 114AA was upheld. The reason for imposition of penalty given by lower authority is that the appellant being a Chartered Engineer issued a Certificate in respect of import of embroidery machine under EPCG whereas the machines....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....imposable on the appellant for issuance of the Chartered Engineer Certificate, as by his act the goods are not liable for confiscation under Section 112(a). As regard Section 114AA, he submits that the appellant is not involved in any business transaction of the imported goods, therefore the penalty under Section 114AA also not correct. He placed reliance on the following judgment : * I. Sahaya ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g certificate without verifying the fact that whether the machines were installed, the importer could evade the Customs duty, therefore, the act of the appellant is very serious to endanger the Revenue, therefore, the penalties imposed under Section 112(a) and 114AA of the Customs Act is correct and legal which do not require any interference. 4. Heard both sides and perused the records. I f....