2019 (11) TMI 567
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., Advocate for the Appellant Shri L. Patra, Assistant Commissioner (AR) for the Respondent ORDER RAJU : This appeal has been filed by M/s. Sopariwala Exports Pvt. Limited against denial of refund under Notification No. 41/2007-ST dated 06.10.2007. 2. Ld. Counsel for the appellant pointed out that they had availed services for the purpose of export and filed refund claim on 12.05.200....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....9, therefore the complete refund claim was not filed within a period of six months and therefore, the same was held as barred by limitation. Ld. Counsel pointed out that in identical circumstances, their refund claim has been allowed by this Tribunal vide order reported at 2019 (22) GSTL 274 (Tri. Ahmd.). He argued that since the quantification of commission payable to foreign service provider too....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d on the ground that the payment of service tax on reverse charge mechanism was effected on 07.05.2009. We find force in the contention of the Ld. Advocate for the appellant inasmuch as that Notification No. 41/2007-S.T., dated 6-10-2007 exempts the taxable services received by the exporter and used for export of the goods from the whole of the service tax leviable thereon under Section 66 and Sec....
TaxTMI