Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (11) TMI 558

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... that seeks to demand an amount of Rs. 6,65,308/- from the petitioner towards Central Excise duty, Education Cess and Secondary Higher Education Cess for the period from July, 2009 to January, 2014, in respect of the carbon dioxide that was produced in its factory and captively consumed in the course of manufacture of beer. The basic premise in the show cause notice is that, during the process of fermentation that is integral to the manufacture of alcoholic liquor, carbon dioxide, which is an excisable commodity, is generated as a by-product and the petitioner admittedly uses the said carbon dioxide in the further manufacturing process to produce alcoholic liquor for human consumption (beer). A reference is made to Notification No. 67/95-C.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he manufacturing process is an independent product mentioned in the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, and hence, the petitioner cannot escape liability to pay duty on the said product at the stage of captive consumption of the same. A reference is made to Rule 4 of the Central Excise Rules, which clearly stipulates that captive consumption is also deemed to be a removal for the purposes of levy of Central Excise duty. Referring to the provisions of Notification No. 67/95-C.E., dated 16-3-1995, the respondents would contend that, inasmuch as the petitioner is admittedly not paying any Central Excise duty on the beer manufactured by it, they cannot claim the benefit of exemption from payment of duty on the carbon dioxide captively co....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d with Entry 84 of List I of the VIIth Schedule to the Constitution. Entry 84 of List I as is stood during the relevant time read as follows : "84. Duties of excise on tobacco and other goods manufactured or produced in India except (a) alcoholic liquors for human consumption and (b) opium, Indian hemp and other narcotic drugs and narcotics." Under the Central Excise Act, the levy and collection of duty is envisaged under Section 3, which is the charging Section. As per the said Section, the levy and collection of Central Excise duty is to be on all excisable goods produced or manufactured in India and at the rates set forth in the Schedule to the Act. Excisable goods are in turn defined under the Act to mean those goods that are sp....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....al Excise Act, the requirement of payment of Central Excise duty on each dutiable product manufactured in the factory of the manufacturer led to an increase in the cost of manufacture of the final product (since the duty paid on the intermediate product had to be absorbed by the manufacturer into the cost of manufacture of the final product), with the introduction of the MODVAT/CENVAT Scheme that was designed to avoid the cascading effect of taxes on the various products that went into the manufacture of a final product, it became possible for a manufacturer to set off any duty paid on a captivelly consumed product in his factory, against the duty paid on the final product that was cleared from his factory. With a view to spare the manufact....