Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (6) TMI 1408

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Rs. 2,66,05,000/- made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, relying on the decision of the Bombay High Court in the case of Creative World (2011) 15 taxmann.com 183 (Bom), ignoring the recent decision of the Supreme Court of India in the case of Navodaya Castle (P) Limited (2015) 56 taxmann.com18 (SC), wherein the Apex Court has upheld the Delhi High Court decision holding that certificate of incorporation, PAN etc., were not sufficient for purpose of identification of subscriber company. (b) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in law, in upholding the decision of the CIT(A) deleting the addition of Rs. 2,66,05,000/- made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, merely on the basis of co....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of their income for the assessment of 2010- 11 was also available. CIT (Appeal) therefore held that transactions were genuine and that the Assessee had established source and credit worthiness of the lenders. 5. Revenue carried the matter before the Tribunal. The Tribunal by its impugned Judgment dismissed the Revenue's Appeal ordering following observations : " We have heard the rival contentions, perused the materials on record and the case laws relied on by the assessee. The Assessing Officer made addition u/s. 68 of the Act in respect of 12 parties holding that the creditors have not appeared in response to the summon issued u/s.131 of the Act and he also held that the genuineness of the transaction and credit worthiness of the....