2019 (11) TMI 18

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... For The Respondent : Shri S.B. Mane, AC, Authorized Representative ORDER Per: Dr. D.M. Misra Heard both sides. 2. This is an appeal filed against Order-in-Appeal No. SK/ GST(AUDIT-ii)/mum/36/Appeals-III/2018 dated 05.03.2018 passed by the Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise (Audit- II), Mumbai. 3. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the appellants are engaged in provi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oner (Appeals), who in turn, rejected their appeal. Hence, the present appeal. 4. At the outset, learned C.A. Shri Mehul Jivani for the appellant submits that in pursuance to resolution passed by the Board of Directors on 7.6.2011, they had transferred all the business of management of food service and vending service of the company to one M/s Sodexo Facilities Management Services India Pvt. Lt....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ir reply to the show-cause notice. Learned C.A. has further submitted that even though as per the impugned order, the learned Commissioner (Appeals) has acknowledged this fact but erroneously upheld the order of the adjudicating authority on the ground that the procedure prescribed under Rule 10(3) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 applicable to inputs and capital goods, has not been followed. In suppo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....atory provisions prescribed under Rule 10(2) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. In his submission, the learned C.A. has categorically made a statement that there was no credit balance against inputs and capital goods as on that date. Whatever credit lying in balance, according to the learned C.A., was relating to input service credit. In support, they have referred to the invoices enclosed with app....