2019 (10) TMI 742

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....C). No. 2736 OF 2019(N) - -<br>Income Tax<br>JUSTICE A. K. JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR For The Petitioner : ADVS. SRI. S. ARUN RAJ, SMT. C. T. SUJA AND SRI. ARJUN S. RAJ For The Respondents : SRI. CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT JUDGMENT The challenge in this Writ Petition is against Exts.P11 and P12 orders passed by the 3rd respondent First Appellate Authority in stay applications....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....8,79,81,702/- under Section 271D and Rs. 44,38,36,515/- under Section 271E of the IT Act. 2. In the stay applications filed along with the Appeals preferred against the penalty orders the petitioner had sought for a stay of recovery of penalty orders confirmed against him pending disposal of the Appeals by the Appellate Authority. The Appellate Authority considered the said applications and dir....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed in Exts.P11 and P12 orders have not been effected by the petitioner. 4. I have heard Sri.Arun Raj S., the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Christopher Abraham, the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 5. I find that Exts.P11 and P12 orders of the First Appellate Authority have required the petitioner society to pay only Rs. 2.5 crores each as against penalty amounts of ....