Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (10) TMI 470

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er the head "Profit and gains of business or profession" under section 28 (iiib)/(iiid) of Income tax Act. 2. Ld. CIT (A) was not justified in denying deduction u/s 80IB on Rs. 42,52,425/- which was the business profit, noticed in form of discrepancy in quantity/valuation of business stock in survey, derived by the assessee from eligible business and disclosed under other head of income at the insistence of Survey Team." 2. At the outset, it is noted that the Ground No. 1 is decided against the assessee by the Co-ordinate Bench vide its order dated 30.01.2017 (ITA No. 285- 288/JP/2016) and the relevant findings reads as under:- "We have heard the rival contentions of both the parties, perused the material available on the record and al....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e what these provisions prescribe for "computation of profits of the eligible business". It is evident that Section 80IB provides for allowing of deduction in respect of profits and gains derived from the eligible business. It is held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that words, by using 'the expression " derived from", Parliament intended to cover sources not beyond the first degree. After analyzing the provision, it held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that the DEPB is an incentive. It is given under Duty Exemption Remission Scheme. Essentially, it is an export incentive. No doubt, the object behind DEPB is to neutralize the incidence of customs duty payment on the import content of export product. This neutralization is provided for b....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....at the ld CIT(A) has followed the decision of the Tribunal as well as the decision of the Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court and therefore, the order of the ld CIT(A) should be confirmed. 5. In light of above discussions, respectively following the decision of the Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court, the matter is decided against the assessee. In the result, the ground of appeal is dismissed. 6. Regarding Ground No. 2, briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessee is engaged in the business of manufacturing of Guwar Gum & Churi etc and has claimed deduction u/s 80IB of the Act. During the course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer observed that the assessee has included the surrendered income of Rs. 42,52,425/- while calcula....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....to show the surrendered amount separately in its P&L account for the reason that deduction u/s 801B of IT Act on net profit could be denied. Had the assessee included the surrendered amount in its closing stock (actual stocktaking), the assessee would have been allowed deduction u/s. 801B of IT Act on its net profit. 9. It was further submitted that the AO did not agree that the closing stock is the actual stock taking at the close of the year which is valued at cost or market whichever is lower and therefore, the closing stock so arrived at is inclusive of surrendered amount, not requiring to be shown separately in P&L account. However if the amount of surrender is enhanced in actual closing stock which is correct as per principle of acco....