Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (6) TMI 1308

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Affairs the Hon'ble High Court transferred the matter to this Tribunal and passed the following order on 13.01.2016 as no notice of the petition was served on the Respondent:- "In terms of the notification Regd. No.D.L.33004/99 dated 7.12.2016 issued by Ministry of Corporate Affairs and in particular, Clause 5 thereof, the present winding up petition under sections 433 (e), 434 and 439(b) of the Companies Act, 1956, stands transferred to the Principal Bench, National Company Law tribunal, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as 'NCLT'). In the first instance, list this matter before the Principal Bench, NCLT on 14th March 2017 for further proceedings, in accordance with law. The Registry is directed to ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....;Operational Debtor' and the invoices raised by the Operational Creditor' have also been placed on record along with receipts (Annexure-B). A perusal of the purchase order issued by the Operational Debtor' would show that purchase was ordered on 22.03.2016 and supply was made. Thereafter invoices were raised. 5. On 16.08.2016 the 'Operational Creditor' sent a demand notice with regard to unpaid debt which was replied on 23.08.2016 alleging that the materials delivered were defective and was of poor quality. According to the 'Operational Creditor' no such communication had ever been made to him before the aforesaid date which infact was a false plea raised to defeat the demand of unpaid debt. 6. On 5.9.2016 ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ional Debtor' at its registered office and also through email for payment of outstanding amount along with interest. The notice has not been replied nor the unpaid debts have been paid. The postal receipts and the speed post tracking reports have been placed on record (Annexure-D) along with emails print (Annexure-E). The master data of the 'Operational Debtor' has also been placed on record. 8. In order to enable the petitioner to continue its proceedings after transfer under the Code compliance affidavit has been filed disclosing that the petitioner wants the petition before this Tribunal to be treated as an application u/s. 9 of the Code. The compliance affidavit shows that notice u/s. 8 of the Code calling upon the 'O....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... However some correspondence concerning the dispute raised by 'Operational Debtor' has been placed on record which we have considered. 10. It would be desirable to make reference to the defect raised by the 'Operational Debtor' in its reply dated 23.08.2016 (Annexure-C). The aforesaid dispute sought to be raised does not appear to be bona fide for the reason that the 'Operational Creditor' had duly informed the 'Operational Debtor' -respondent that its authorised quality person at Natani Steel Rolling Mills, Jaipur was present to check the length and quality of each and every Channel at the time of rolling, loading and despatch to the Factory. The authorised quality person had cleared and approved the Chan....