Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (12) TMI 1708

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Limited under Section 60(5)(c) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 r/w Rule 11 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 (for short, I&B Code, 2016). 2. The prayer made in the Application is to reject the resolution passed on 08.10.2018 at 19th Committee of Creditors' (CoC) meeting for liquidation of Corporate Debtor viz., M/s. Oceanic Edibles International Limited, Chennai-94 and to direct the Respondents to issue the Information Memorandum and consider all the Resolution Plans on merits in accordance with law and to pass such further order or orders as deemed fit under the circumstances and thus render justice. 3. During the course of arguments the Counsel for the Applicant has referred to various documents including the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ities or any question of law or facts, arising out of or in relation to the Insolvency Resolution or Liquidation Proceedings of the Corporate Debtor or Corporate Person under this Code. 5. The Counsel for the Applicant has further submitted that the Tribunal has mandate to go into the facts of the CIR Process in relation to the issuance of 'Information Memorandum' and 'Expression of Interest'. He has submitted that for the purpose of issuance of 'Expression of Interest' there requires 'Information Memorandum', which needs to be prepared as per the Regulation 40 A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2018. Having made these submissi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd could get only four responses from the prospective Resolution Applicants, out of which, one was without mandatory EMD and the other two were ARCs. But, it is worthwhile to be mentioned that the 'Expression of Interest' was issued by the erstwhile Resolution Professional without prior approval of the CoC. 8. On 07.04.2018, the new Resolution Professional has issued the "Expression of Interest", after seeking the approval of the CoC and the time period was extended for filing the response to the "Expression of Interest", till 14.04.2018, but there was no response from any prospective Resolution Applicant. In the process, as per the submissions of the Resolution Professional, he has been carrying on the forensic audit as the nature....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....gh 3rd Amendment on 03.07.2018 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2018, which could not be made applicable with retrospective effect. The Resolution Professional has further submitted that the Application filed by the Applicant is not falling within the purview of Section 60(5)(c) of the I&B Code 2016 as the Applicant is one of the suspended Directors, who has no locus standi to seek either for an extension of the time period or exclusion of any of the time period of CIR Process, which is the sole discretion of the CoC as per the provisions of Section 12 of the I&B Code 2016. 11. Heard the Counsel for the Applicant, Resolution Professional and perused the recor....