Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (10) TMI 406

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....VED BY DS (5) FOR THE RESPONDENT(S) NO. 1,2 ORAL ORDER PER : HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI 1. Rule. Ms. Maithili Mehta, learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice of rule for respondents. 2. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the notice dated 16.8.2019 issued by the second respondent - The Assistant Commissioner ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....attached. 5. It appears that subsequently on 20.8.2019, the first appeal came to be dismissed as the petitioner was not willing to pre-deposit an amount of Rs. 8,52,841/-. Against the said order, the petitioner went in second appeal before the Gujarat Value Added Tax Tribunal. 6. Being aggrieved by the action of the second respondent of attaching the bank account of the petitioner despite the pe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e-deposit 20% of the demand, against which the petitioner has preferred an appeal before the Tribunal, which is pending. 9. Thus, despite the fact that the stay application of the petitioner was pending hearing before the first appellate authority, the second respondent authority has resorted to the drastic action of attaching the above-referred bank account of the petitioner under section 44 of....