2019 (10) TMI 366
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Per : S.S GARG The present appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 23.04.2018 passed by the Commissioner (A) whereby the Commissioner (A) has allowed the appeal filed by the Department and set aside the Order-in-Original. 2. Briefly the facts of the present case are that the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of Alloy steel and non-Alloy steel falling under Chapter 72 of the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the appellant and set aside the Order-in-Original. 3. Heard both sides and perused the records. 4. Learned Counsel for the appellant submitted that the impugned order is not sustainable in law as the same has been passed without properly appreciating the facts and the law. He further submitted that the original authority has verified each and every invoice and has also verified the usage of the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....onstruction only', without appreciating the detailed findings of the original authority and without giving any reasons as to how the services availed by the appellant are not 'input service'. 5. On the other hand, the Learned AR defended the impugned order. 6. After considering the submissions of both the parties and perusal of the material on record, I find that the original authority has analy....