AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) 
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter. 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2019 (10) TMI 340
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nder consideration, the assessee has sold an immovable property at Flat No. 303, Riya Plaza, Old H.B. Road, Ranchi for a consideration of Rs. 34.50 lacs vide sale deed dated 16-12-2014.The AO noted that the property was valued by the Stamp Duty Authority at Rs. 36,21,600/-. Accordingly, the AO proposed to make the addition to the capital gain by adopting full value consideration u/s 50C of the Act. The assessee objected to the adoption of the stamp duty valuation as on the date of sale deed and contended that there was an agreement to sell between the parties on 31-07-2014 and therefore, as per proviso to Section 60C, the stamp duty valuation as on the date of agreement should be taken as full value consideration. The AO did not accept the contention of the assessee and adopted the full value consideration as per stamp duty valuation as on the date of sale deed and thereby made an addition of Rs. 1,71,600/- to the capital income of the assessee. The assessee challenged the action of the AO before the ld. CIT(A) but could not succeed as the ld. CIT(A) held that proviso to Section 50C has prospective effect and not retrospective effect. 2.2 Before us, the ld.AR has referred to the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... for a sale consideration of Rs. 34.50 lacs. Part consideration of Rs. 1.00 lac was also received by the assessee as on the date of agreement i.e. 31-07- 2014. This payment of Rs. 1.00 lac received by the assessee is duly reflected in the bank account of the assessee placed at page no. 21 of the paper book and the entry in the bank account is duly reflected indicating the payment received from the purchaser Shri Deepak Kumar. Thus so far the existence of agreement and receipt of part consideration through banking channel as on the date of agreement dated 31-07-2014 is concerned, the same is not in dispute and also reflected in the sale deed dated 16-12-2014. At page no. 6 of the said sale deed, the reference of sale agreement dated 31-07-2014 is made alongwith part payment of Rs. 1.00 lac. Therefore, the question arises whether the stamp duty valuation on the date of agreement will be relevant for the purpose of adopting full value consideration u/s 50C of the Act or stamp duty valuation as on the date of sale deed will be considered for this purpose. The assessee has relied on various decisions of the Coordinate Benches of the Tribunal wherein issue of retrospective applicability ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... has not disputed this agreement. The assessee has received payment in pursuance of this agreement through account payee cheque. Let us take a situation where a vendee fails to get the sale deed executed. The assessee being vendor has a remedy for filing a suit for specific performance under the Specific Relief Act. The time limit to file a suit for specific performance has been provided in Indian Limitation Act, which is three years. In such situation, when the vendor files a suit for specific performance to force the vendee to purchase the property. In that situation, he will not pay anything over and above, the amount stated in the sale agreement. In that situation, the assessee would not get anything more than the amount mentioned in the agreement, though such situation may arise after three-four years on execution of the decree passed in a suit for specific performance. In between there may an appreciation or depreciation in the said property. Circle rate may rise or reduce. In other words, at the time of an agreement in respect of an immovable property, a right in persona is created in favour of the transferee/vendee. When such right is created in favour of the vendee, the ve....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....for the transfer of the asset and the date of registration of the transfer of the asset are not same, the value referred to in subsection (1) may be taken as the value assessable by any authority of a State Government for the purpose of payment of stamp duty in respect of such transfer on the date of the agreement. (5) The provisions of sub-section (4) shall apply only in a case where the amount of consideration or a part thereof has been received by any mode other than cash on or before a date of agreement for transfer of the asset. ** 15. Taking a clue from the report, a proviso has been appended by way of Finance Act, 2016 to section 50C and such proviso reads as under: "Provided that where the date of the agreement fixing the amount of consideration and the date of registration for the transfer of the capital asset are not the same, the value adopted or assessed or assessable by the stamp valuation authority on the date of agreement may be taken for the purposes of computing full value of consideration for such transfer: Provided further that the first proviso shall apply only in a case where the amount of consideration, or a part thereof,....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....to the DVO is made under section 50C(2). Normally, as observed earlier, when a sale agreement was executed, payment was received in part performance of the agreement, then vendor would not get anything more than the amount agreed in the sale agreement. There may be a time gap between execution of agreement to sell and execution of sale deed. In between if circle rate is being enhanced, then he would like to challenge adoption of higher sale value on the strength of sale agreement. In that situation, unnecessary energy would be devoted in ascertaining fair market value of the property on the date of sale. The encumbrance on the property by virtue of sale agreement would also goad the DVO to determine the fair market value of the property on the date of sale at a lesser amount than the value adopted for the purpose of payment of stamp duty. We have already made a reference to Specific Relief Act and how a vendor or vendee could enforce the sale agreement under Specific Relief Act. Under such enforcement, they would settle their right on the basis of agreed terms in the sale agreement. This proviso would only simplify this exercise i.e. instead remitting the matter to the DVO under se....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... or assessed by the stamp valuation authority for the purpose of payment of stamp duty shall be taken as the full value of consideration for the purposes of computation of capital gains. The Income Tax Simplification Committee (Easwar Committee) has in its first report, pointed out that this provision does not provide any relief where the seller has entered into an agreement to sell the property much before the actual date of transfer of the immovable property and the sale consideration is fixed in such agreement, whereas similar provision exists in section 43CA of the Act i.e. when an immovable property is sold as a stock-in-trade. It is proposed to amend the provisions of section 50C so as to provide that where the date of the agreement fixing the amount of consideration for the transfer of immovable property and the date of registration are not the same, the stamp duty value on the date of the agreement may be taken for the purposes of computing the full value of consideration. It is further proposed to provide that this provision shall apply only in a case where the amount of consideration referred to therein, or a part thereof, has been paid by way of an account payee cheque o....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tion to the effect that a curative amendment to avoid unintended consequences is to be treated as retrospective in nature even though it may not state so specifically". In this case, it was specifically observed, and it was this observation which was reproduced with approval by Their Lordships, as follows: 'Now that the legislature has been compassionate enough to cure these shortcomings of provision, and thus obviate the unintended hardships, such an amendment in law, in view of the well settled legal position to the effect that a curative amendment to avoid unintended consequences is to be treated as retrospective in nature even though it may not state so specifically, the insertion of second proviso must be given retrospective effect from the point of time when the related legal provision was introduced. In view of these discussions, as also for the detailed reasons set out earlier, we cannot subscribe to the view that it could have been an "intended consequence" to punish the assessees for non-deduction of tax at source by declining the deduction in respect of related payments, even when the corresponding income is duly brought to tax. That will be going much beyon....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rmination was, whether sales-tax collected by the assessee and paid after the end of the relevant previous year but within the time allowed under the relevant sales-tax law should be disallowed under s. 43B of the Act while computing the business income of the previous year? That was a case which related to asst. yr. 1984- 85. The relevant accounting period ended on 30th June, 1983. The ITO disallowed the deduction claimed by the assessee which was on account of sales-tax collected by the assessee for the last quarter of the relevant accounting year. The deduction was disallowed under s. 43B which, as stated above, was inserted w.e.f. 1st April, 1984. It is also relevant to note that the first proviso which came into force w.e.f. 1st April, 1988 was not on the statute book when the assessments were made in the case of Allied Motors (P.) Ltd. Etc. (supra). However, the assessee contended that even though the first proviso came to be inserted w.e.f. 1st April, 1988, it was entitled to the benefit of that proviso because it operated retrospectively from 1st April, 1984, when s. 43B stood inserted. This is how the question of retrospectivity arose in Allied Motors (P.) Ltd. Etc. (supra....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t, 2003, to the extent indicated above, should be read as retrospective. It would, therefore, operate from 1st April, 1988, when the first proviso was introduced. It is true that the Parliament has explicitly stated that Finance Act, 2003, will operate w.e.f. 1st April, 2004. However, the matter before us involves the principle of construction to be placed on the provisions of Finance Act, 2003." 9. So far as the amendment to Section 50C being retrospective in effect is concerned, there is no doubt about the legal position. I hold the provisos to Section 50C being effective from 1st April 2003. This is precisely what the learned counsel has prayed for. In his detailed written submissions, he has made out of a strong case for the amendment to Section 50C being treated as retrospective and with effect from 1st April 2003. The plea of the assessee is indeed well taken and deserves acceptance. What follows is this. The matter will now go back to the Assessing Officer. In case he finds that a registered agreement to sell, as claimed by the assessee, was actually executed on 29.6.2005 and the partial sale consideration was received through banking channels, the Assessing Officer....