2014 (9) TMI 1206

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... common order for the sake of convenience and brevity. ITA No. 4080/M/2012- A.Y. 2008-09 2. The assessee has raised three substantive grounds which read as under: "The Appellant appeals against the impugned order dated April 26th 2012, of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-17, Mumbai (the CIT(A)) (received by it on May 4th, 2012) under section 253 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act) on the following amongst other grounds each of which is in the alternative and without prejudice to one another: 1. The CIT(A) ought to have held that the Appellant had disclaimed deduction by way of depreciation under section 32(1) of the Act in the earlier years and, therefore, the written down value on which depreciation was to....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sturb the finality of the orders of the orders of the earlier years. The learned Departmental Representative , on the other hand, has no objection if a specific direction is given to the Assessing Officer. We, therefore, direct the Assessing Officer that the written down value as at the beginning of the year shall be computed only on the basis of the orders which have already reached the finality. In other words, the depreciation actually claimed or directed to be allowed only shall be taken into consideration before arriving the written down value of the assets in question. Respectfully following the above findings of the Tribunal (supra), we hold accordingly. Ground No. 1 is treated as allowed for statistical purpose. 6. Ground No. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....per provisions of Sec. 14A r.w. Rule 8D, an amount of Rs. 10,33,153/- was added to the income of the assessee. 8. Aggrieved by this, the assessee carried the matter before the Ld. CIT(A). After considering the facts and the submissions, the Ld. CIT(A) observed that the AO has not passed any speaking order in so far as disallowance under Rule 8D to clause (ii) is concerned. He accordingly directed the AO to look into this while giving appeal effect to his order and confirmed the disallowance of other expenditure. 9. Aggrieved by this, the assessee is before us. 10. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee vehemently submitted that the entire investments have been made out of own funds therefore there is no question of allocating any interes....