Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2019 (9) TMI 1161

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....fication issued by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, by way of reply to query No. 4 of Circular No. 1/2016 or issue directions for suitable amendment thereto; (e) Quash show cause notice dated 24.11.2016 issued to the petitioners under section 134(3) of the Corhpanies Act, 2013? (f) dispense with the service of advance notices on the respondents; (g) exempt the filing of the certified copies of the Annexures as also grant permission to file photocopies of the Annexures; (h) issue any other appropriate writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case;" 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the provisions of Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013 is unconstitutional as it is violative of Entries 43 and 44 of List-1 List under the 7th Schedule of the Constitution. Learned counsel for the petitioner has taken this Court to the said entries and has submitted that the provisions contained under Section 135 of the Companies Act, is regulatory in nature and not mandatory. 3. It is also submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that unless a specific ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....under Section 134(3) of the Companies Act also deserves to be quashed and set aside. 6. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that under Section 135 of the Companies Act read with the CSR Rules, corporate social responsibility has been imposed on companies and as stated in the memo of petition, mainly for the reason that the respondents are vested with the power, jurisdiction and authority to enact a law as per Clause 43 and 44 of List-I to the 7th Schedule to the Constitution of India, the same being violative of Article 14, much less, the Article 19 to the Constitution of India. It is also submitted by the counsel for the respondent that looking to the amendment carried out in Section 135 of the Companies Act which is made effective from 2018 onwards, the same is to be read with Circular No.21/2014 and in fact no retrospectivity has been given to the said circular. Only for the purpose of calculation of average net profit, the earlier years are to be looked into, otherwise, the liability starts with effect from 1st April, 2014 onwards. 7. It is also submitted by counsel for the respondents that the provisions of law cannot be quashed merely because the prov....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... report and also place it on the company's website, if any, in such manner as may be prescribed; and (b) ensure that the activities as are included in Corporate Social Responsibility Policy of the company are undertaken by the company. (5) The Board of every company referred to in sub-section (1), shall ensure that the company spends, in every financial year, at least two per cent. of the average net profits of the company made during the three immediately preceding financial years, in pursuance of its Corporate Social Responsibility Policy: Provided that the company shall give preference to the local area and areas around it where it operates, for spending the amount earmarked for Corporate Social Responsibility activities: Provided further that if the company fails to spend such amount, the Board shall, in its report made under clause (o) of sub-section (3) of section 134, specify the reasons for not spending the amount. Explanation.-For the purposes of this section "average net profit" shall be calculated in accordance with the provisions of section 198." (emphasis supplied) 10. Under the Companies Act, 2013, Companies (Corp....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....me meanings respectively assigned to them in the Act. 3. Corporate Social Responsibility - (1) Every company including its holding or subsidiary, and a foreign company defined under clause (42) of section 2 of the Act having its branch office or project office in India, which fulfils the criteria specified in sub-section (1) of section 135 of the Act shall comply with the provisions of section 135 of the Act and these rules: Provided that net worth, turnover or net profit of a foreign company of the Act shall be computed in accordance with balance sheet and profit and loss account of such company prepared In accordance with the provisions of clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 381 and section 198 of the Act. (2) Every company which ceases to be a company covered under sub section (1) of section 135 of the Act for three consecutive financial years shall not be required to - (a) constitute a CSR Committee; and (b) comply with the provisions contained In sub-section (2) to (5) of the said section, till such time it meets the criteria specified In sub-section (1) of section 135." 11. It appears from the provisions of the Companies Ac....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of the Companies Act and only the companies are covered, hence the said Section 135 is discriminatory in nature. 15. We do not want to accept this contention mainly for the reason that as stated under Section 135(1) of the Companies Act, those companies whose net worth is rupees five hundred crore or more, turnover is rupees one thousand crore or a turnover of rupees one thousand crore or more, this criteria has been laid down. The companies are class by themselves. The classification is reasonable and intelligent classification. There is vast difference between a Sole Proprietorship and a company. There is vast difference between a Trust and a Company. Trusts, Sole Proprietorship, Partnership Firms etc. cannot be compared to a Company. There is a difference in the liability also. For instance, in Sole Proprietorship, the person who is a sole proprietor, is not a separate legal entity, whereas, in case of companies, they are separate legal entity which can be sued and can sue. 16. Moreover, looking to the totality of the circumstances, as pointed out under Section 135 of the Companies Act and looking to their profit and total turnover, the objects sought to be achieved by th....