TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2019 (9) TMI 633
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ogy, Govt. of India vide its approval dated 21/3/2013 given in Form 3CM for the period from 1/4/2012 to 31/3/2015. The year under consideration falls in between the above said period. 4. In the return of income, the assessee claimed deduction u/s 35(2)AB) to the tune of 51.03 lakhs, being 200% of the expenditure incurred on research and development of Rs. 25.51 lakhs. The AO noticed that the assessee has furnished Form No.3CL issued by DSIR, New Delhi wherein an amount of Rs. 2,63,000/- alone was found to have been approved. Accordingly the AO restricted the deduction u/s 35(2AB) of the Act to the extent of 200% of 2.63 lakhs referred above i.e to the extent of Rs. 5,26,000/- Accordingly he disallowed the excess claim of Rs. 45.77 lakhs. The ld CIT(A) also confirmed the same and hence the assessee has filed this appeal before us. 5. We heard the parties and perused the record. We noticed that the issue as to whether furnishing of Form No.3CL is mandatory for allowing deduction u/s 35(2AB) of the Act came to be considered by the coordinate bench in the case of M/s Mahindra Electric Mobility Ltd., Vs. ACIT (ITA No.641/Bang/2017 dated 14/9/2018) and the Tribunal, by considering the ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....orm No. 3CK to maintain separate accounts for each R&D centre approved under Section 35(2AB) by the Prescribed Authority, and to get the accounts duly audited every year by an Auditor as defined in subsection (2) of section 288 of the IT Act 1961. (The statutory auditors of the Company should audit the R&D accounts. To facilitate this audit separate books of accounts for R&D should be maintained. Also, the statutory auditors should sign the auditors' certificate in the details required to be submitted as per annexure-IV of the guidelines to facilitate submission of Report in Form 3CL). (ii) As per guideline 5(vi) of the guidelines, the audited accounts for each year maintained separately for each approved centre shall be furnished to the Secretary, Department of Scientific & Industrial Research by 31st day of October of the succeeding year, along with information as per Annexure-IV of the Guidelines. (iii) As per guideline 5(ix) Expenditures, which are directly identifiable with approved R&D facility only, shall be eligible for the weighted tax deduction. However, expenditure in R&D on utilities which are supplied from a common source which also services areas of the plant othe....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....subject matter of several judicial decisions rendered by various Benches of ITAT. (i) The Pune ITAT in the case of Cummins India Ltd. Vs. DCIT in ITA No.309/Pun/2014 for AY 2009-10 order dated 15.5.2018 had an occasion to consider a case where part of the claim for deduction u/s.35(2AB) of the Act was claimed supported by Form No.3CL but part of it was not supported by Form No.3CL. The Pune ITAT held as follows:- "45. The issue which is raised in the present appeal is that whether where the facility has been recognized and necessary certification is issued by the prescribed authority, the assessee can avail the deduction in respect of expenditure incurred on in-house R&D facility, for which the adjudicating authority is the Assessing Officer and whether the prescribed authority is to approve expenditure in form No.3CL from year to year. Looking into the provisions of rules, it stipulates the filing of audit report before the prescribed authority by the persons availing the deduction under section 35(2AB) of the Act but the provisions of the Act do not prescribe any methodology of approval to be granted by the prescribed authority vis-à-vis expenditure from year to year....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... deductions of the aforesaid expenditure incurred by the assessee in terms of the s. 35(2AB) of the Act and in coming to this conclusion, the Tribunal relied upon the judgment of Gujarat High Court in CIT vs. Claris Lifesciences Ltd. 326 ITR 251 (Guj). In its decision the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court held that the cut-off date mentioned in the certificate issued by the DSIR would be of no relevance. What is to be seen is that the assessee was in indulging in R&D activity and had incurred the expenditure thereupon. Once a certificate by DSIR is issued, that would be sufficient to hold that the assessee fulfils the conditions laid down in the aforesaid provisions. The Hon'ble Delhi High Court followed the decision of the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court and upheld the decision of the Tribunal. The Hon'ble Delhi High Court quoted the following observations of the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court and agreed with the said view: "7. ... The lower authorities are reading more than what is provided by law. A plain and simple reading of the Act provides that on approval of the research and development facility, expenditure so incurred is eligible for weighted deduction. 8. The Tribunal has considered....