Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (9) TMI 557

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e assessee was allowed on the preliminary ground of maintainability (without touching issue on merits). 2. Brief facts are that the respondent sold the property called 'Gupta House' situated at Kherki Daula, NH-8, Gurgaon on 24.2.2009. He filed his return on 12.10.2012 for A.Y 2009-10 declaring income of Rs. 56,74,539/- under the heads 'income from house property', Rs. 2,93,704/- as 'income from other sources' and Rs. 10,67,16,676/- as 'long term capital gain' totaling Rs. 11,26,84,919/- . He claimed to have sold an immovable property for a consideration of Rs. 21.5 crores and further claimed that the cost of acquisition and cost of improvement after indexation came to Rs. 5,99,74,218/-. Thus, he claimed de....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....impugned assessment order and that too without complying the mandatory conditions Sections 147 to 151 of the Income Tax Act 1961 and reasons recorded are invalid in the eyes of law and reopening of the case and framing the impugned assessment order is bad in law and beyond the jurisdiction. 4. That in my case and in any view of the matter, the action of Ld. AO in framing the impugned assessment order us 14" and that too without complying with mandatory conditions of Section 147 to 151 is had to law and against the facts and circumstances of the case. 5. That having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case. Ld. A.O. has erred in law and on facts. In denying the benefit deduction of Rs. 4,83,09,106/- u/s 54 of the Income Tax Ac....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d an industrial property consisting of property named - `Gupta House' at 42 Rri Milestone, Village Kherki Daula, for Rs. 21.5 crores. The indexed cost of acquisition of this property was claimed at Rs. 5,99,74,218/-. Net capital gain for the year under consideration as per the return of the assessee is Rs. 15.50 crore. The assessee is also holding 8 flats in his name, out of which, 7 are in DLF Park Place. DLF City, Phase-V, Golf Course Road; Gurgaon and 1 flat in The Belaire, DLF City Phase-V, Golf Course Road, Gurgaon. Further, the assessee has claimed deduction u/s 54 of the I.T. Act, 1961 on the basis of amount invested in two flats, viz Flat No.D-153. DLF City and Flat No.B-1916, DLF City, Gurgaon, total investment amounting ....