TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2019 (9) TMI 392
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....a common order, they are being disposed of by this Court. Facts of Writ Petition No.3519/2019 are narrated hereunder. 02-The petitioner before this Court has filed this present petition being aggrieved by the order passed by the Assessing Authority dated 22/11/2018 (Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Circle 13) under the provisions of Madhya Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2002. Various grounds have been raised by the petitioner and reliance has been placed upon a judgment delivered in the case of Whirlpool Corporation Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks, Mumbai reported in (1998) 8 SCC, on the issue of alternative remedy. 03-Undisputedly, the petitioner does have a remedy of an appeal. Section 46 (1) of the Madhya Pradesh Value Added Tax Act,....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ule of self-imposed limitation. It is essentially a rule of policy, convenience and discretion rather than a rule of law. Undoubtedly, it is within the discretion of the High Court to grant relief under Article 226 despite the existence of an alternative remedy. However, the High Court must not interfere if there is an adequate efficacious alternative remedy available to the petitioner and he has approached the High Court without availing the same unless he has made out an exceptional case warranting such interference or there exist sufficient grounds to invoke the extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226. (See: State of U.P. vs. Mohammad Nooh, AIR 1958 SC 86; Titaghur Paper Mills Co. Ltd. vs. State of Orissa, (1983) 2 SCC 433; Harban....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....wami (Moingiri Maharaj) Sahakari Dugdha Utpadak Sanstha vs. State of Maharashtra, (2001) 8 SCC 509; Pratap Singh vs. State of Haryana, (2002) 7 SCC 484 and GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. vs. ITO, (2003) 1 SCC 72). 13. In Nivedita Sharma vs. Cellular Operators Assn. of India, (2011) 14 SCC 337, this Court has held that where hierarchy of appeals is provided by the statute, party must exhaust the statutory remedies before resorting to writ jurisdiction for relief and observed as follows: "12. In Thansingh Nathmal v. Supdt. of Taxes, AIR 1964 SC 1419 this Court adverted to the rule of self-imposed restraint that the writ petition will not be entertained if an effective remedy is available to the aggrieved person and observed: (AIR p. 1423, p....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....must be followed, and it is not competent to the party to pursue the course applicable to cases of the second class. The form given by the statute must be adopted and adhered to.' The rule laid down in this passage was approved by the House of Lords in Neville v. London Express Newspapers Ltd., 1919 AC 368 and has been reaffirmed by the Privy Council in Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago v. Gordon Grant and Co. Ltd., 1935 AC 532 (PC) and Secy. of State v. Mask and Co., AIR 1940 PC 105 It has also been held to be equally applicable to enforcement of rights, and has been followed by this Court throughout. The High Court was therefore justified in dismissing the writ petitions in limine." 14. In Mafatlal Industries Ltd. v. Union of In....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....mind ourselves the observations made by this Court in Munshi Ram v. Municipal Committee, Chheharta, (1979) 3 SCC 83. In the said decision, this Court was pleased to observe that: (SCC p. 88, para 23). "23. ... when a revenue statute provides for a person aggrieved by an assessment thereunder, a particular remedy to be sought in a particular forum, in a particular way, it must be sought in that forum and in that manner, and all the other forums and modes of seeking [remedy] are excluded.' " 15. Thus, while it can be said that this Court has recognized some exceptions to the rule of alternative remedy, i.e., where the statutory authority has not acted in accordance with the provisions of the enactment in question, or in defiance of th....