TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2019 (8) TMI 1269
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e course of hearing has filed the concise grounds of appeal which read as under : 2. The assessee is Association of Persons (AOP) Registered as a Primary Agriculture Credit Co-operative Society under the provisions of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 and engaged in the business of providing credit facilities to its Members for Agriculture related allied activities, selling of feritlisers, PDF Distribution and allied activities as per the byelaws approved by Registrar for Co-operative Societies. The assessee has filed the Return of Income on 29.09.2016 with gross total income of Rs. 54,07,562 after claiming deduction under Section 80P(2) of the Act of Rs. 53,38,391 and disclosed total income of Rs. 72,171. Subsequently, the case was selected for limited scrutiny through CASS and Notice under Section 143(2) & 142(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) were issued calling for details of list of Members, loans and deposits and evidences in support of the claim. The Assessing Officer found various discrepancies in the claims and dealt on three disputed issues being interest on deposits with Nationalised Banks, rental income and loss from PD System. In the course of hearing, the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....sed the material on record. Prima facie, the sole disputed issue being denial of claim of deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(ii) of the Act. The Assessing Officer has dealt on the interest income from investment / deposits in Banks, whereas the assessee society is engaged in business of carrying on banking and providing credit facilities. In the present assessment year, the assessee has made fixed deposits with Karnataka DCC Bank and received interest income and the assessee has claimed deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act further Assessing Officer found that the assessee has provided Banking facilities to the nominal members. Whereas the ld. AR has restricted his arguments to the extent of denial of deduction under Section 80P(2) of the Act and further submitted that the nominal members has been categorized as members and are eligible for benefits. Whereas CIT (Appeals) has relied on the judicial decisions, which shall apply to a society which is engaged in numerous activities but in the present case the assessee society is engaged in providing facilities of Banking business or credit facilities to its members. We found the issue of denial of deduction under Section 80P....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Totgars Co-operative Sale Society Ltd., 395 ITR 611 (Karn.). We have carefully gone through the said judgment. The facts of the case before the Hon'ble Karnataka High Court was that the Hon'ble Court was considering a case relating to Assessment Years 2007-08 to 2011-12. In case decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of the very same assessee, the Assessment Years involved was Assessment Years 1991-92 to 1999-2000. The nature of interest income for all the Assessment Years was identical. The bone of contention of the Assessee in AY 2007-08 to 2011-12 was that the deduction under Section 80P(2) of the Act is claimed by the respondent assessee under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act and not under Section 80P(2)(a) of the Act which was the claim in AY 1991-92 to 1999- 2000. The reason given by the Assessee was that in AY 2007-08 to 2011-12 investments and deposits after the Supreme Court's decision against the assessee Totgar's Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. (supra), were shifted from Schedule Banks to Cooperative Bank. U/s.80P(2)(d) of the Act, income by way of interest or dividends derived by a Co-operative Society from its investments with any other Co-operative Socie....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he AO, members of the assessee-society consisted of two types viz. regular member and nominal members. It is the case of the Revenue that assessee is doing more business with nominal members than the regular member in order to earn more profit, which is against the law, and therefore, there is a break-down of principle of mutuality resulting disentitlement of exemption under section 80P. The ld.AO relied upon the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Citizens Cooperative Society Ltd. (supra) to support his view. While the case of the assessee is that being a primary agriculture credit society, it is entitled for exemption under sub-section (4) of section 80P. Judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court relied upon by the Revenue is distinguishable on facts. In that case assessee was a cooperative society registered under Multi State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002, while in the present case, assessee is a primary agriculture credit society registered under Gujarat State Cooperative Societies Act. The Hon'ble Supreme Court disentitled the assessee from claiming exemption under section 80P due to violation of provisions of MACSA, under which it was formed, and most of the business of....