2018 (11) TMI 1671
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nsi Lal Bhat (Judicial Member) For the Appellant : Mr. M. P. Sahay, Advocate. For the Respondent : None ORDER This appeal has been preferred by 'Sudhi Sachdev', Promoter of 'M/s Auto Décor Pvt. Ltd.' (Corporate Debtor) against order dated 2nd August, 2018 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), New Delhi Bench whereby application under Section 9 of ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Section 138 is really a civil cases of recovery of the money, therefore, in view of the pendency of such case, application under section 9 of I&B Code is not maintainable. 4. Having heard learned counsel for the Appellant and perusal of records, we are not inclined to accept the submission made on behalf of the Appellant. 5. In "Innoventive Industries Ltd. Vs. ICICI Bank and Ors." - (2018)1 ....
TaxTMI