Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (8) TMI 1095

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on. 3. With consent of learned counsel on both sides, main writ petition is taken up, heard out and is being disposed of. 4.To be noted, pursuant to earlier hearing on 30.07.2019, Revenue counsel has kept the records of the Department ready in the hearing today. 5. Be that as it may, there is no disputation or disagreement that the impugned order has been made under Section 16 of 'Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959' (' TNGST Act' for brevity). 6.There is no disputation that Section 16 of TNGST Act is in pari materia to Section 21 of 'Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 (Tamil Nadu Act 32 of 2006)', which shall hereinafter be referred to as 'TNVAT Act' for brevity. Impugned order pertains to revised a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e revised assessment. One aspect pertains to what can be described as 'suppression' and the other aspect pertains to what can be described as 'stock reconciliation'. 9. Post aforesaid order of this Court, writ petitioner sent a communication dated 11.03.2016 to the Department followed by another communication dated 03.04.2019. In these communications, writ petitioner has specifically sought for details of stock taken at the time of inspection. 10. The respondent, had earlier sent a communication dated 27.01.2016 with certain enclosures and to be noted, this communication is also post aforesaid earlier order of this Court. Earlier order of this Court is cited as No.2 in the said communication. Said communication mentions a....