TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2019 (8) TMI 508
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..../- is not entitled for deduction u/sec. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act and the same is wrongly allowed by the Assessing Officer and asked the assessee why the order of the Assessing Officer cannot be recalled. The assessee has made a detailed submission by stating that he is eligible for deduction u/sec. 80P(2)(a)(i) as the Assessing Officer has examined the issue. However, the ld.Pr.CIT not agreeing with the submissions made by the assessee and by considering the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Totgar's Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. Vs. ITO (322 ITR 283) directed the Assessing Officer to redo the assessment afresh as per law. 3. On being aggrieved, assessee carried the matter in appeal before this Tribunal. 4. Ld. counsel for the assessee has submitted that the Assessing Officer after examining the books of account and the details filed by the assessee, has passed the assessment order dated 31/01/2015, which is neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. He further submitted that the issue involved in this appeal is with regard to interest earned by the assessee from the fixed deposits is eligible u/sec. 80P(2)(a)(i) as per the decision ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tion u/sec. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. The coordinate bench of this tribunal in the case of Sri Uma Kamandaleswara Co-operative Rural Bank Ltd. Vs. Addl. CIT in ITA No. 199/VIZ/2017, dated 13/02/2019 by following the aforesaid judgments has held that interest received on surplus funds by the assessee is eligible u/sec. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. For the sake of convenience, the relevant portion of the order is extracted as under:- "7. We have heard both the sides, perused the material available on record and orders of the authorities below. 8. The only issue involved in this appeal is whether assessee is entitled for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) in respect of surplus funds deposits with the bank. The assessee is a primary agricultural Co-op Credit Society extending credit facility to its members. The assessee is also entitled to claim for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. So far as this fact is concerned, there is no dispute. The assessee has received an amount of Rs. 11,29,453/- on account of surplus funds deposited with the DCCB bank and claimed deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. The Assessing Officer by following the judgment of the Hon'....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ore it was liable to be deducted in terms of section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. The Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in case of Guttigedarara Credit Co-operative Society Ltd. Vs. ITO (supra) by following the decision of A.P. High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Andhra Pradesh State Co-operative Bank Ltd. (supra) has held that "interest earned on the deposits in the bank by the assessee cooperative society providing credit facility to its members would be quantified for deduction u/s 80P of the Act". We therefore respectfully following the jurisdictional High Court as well as the judgement of the Karnataka High Court, allow this ground of appeal raised by the assessee." 9. A similar issue has been considered by the Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh High Court in the case of Vavveru Co-op Rural Bank Ltd. (supra) wherein by considering the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Totgars Co-operative Credit Society Ltd., (supra) has held as under:- "7. It appears that the petitioners are engaged in the sale of fertilisers to its members. A portion of the income derived therefrom is deposited by the petitioners in Nationalised Banks. The income derived by way of interest on the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....hile sub-clause (i) uses the expression "business", sub-clause (ii) uses the expression "industry". Moreover, all the 7 sub-clauses are connected to the expression "co-operative society" by the words "engaged in" appearing in sub-clause (a). 12. The sheet anchor of the case of the petitioners is the expression "attributable to" appearing in the last part of clause (a) of sub-section (2) of section 80P. Since the statute does not use the expression "derived from", but uses the expression "attributable to", the contention of the petitioners is that clause (a) should receive a wider interpretation. 13. The above contention cannot be rejected outright, for the simple reason that in many statutes and for that matter even in the Income-tax Act, the expression "attributable to" is sometimes used with the prefix "directly". The words "directly attributable" to would certainly narrow down the scope of the expression "attributable to". Therefore, the fact that the expression "attributable to" is wider in scope than the expression "derived from" cannot be denied. 14. Several decisions have been relied upon by both sides, not necessarily in the chronological order. But we think that anal....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....(2)(a)(i)(2)(e) and not around section 80P(2)(a)(i). The assessee in that case was running a consumer co-operative store and was also involved in the distribution of controlled commodities such as wheat, sugar, rice and cloth on behalf of the Government under the Public Distribution Scheme for which it received commission. Whether the commission so received could be treated as an income under section 80P(2)(e) eligible for deduction was the question before the court. The Supreme Court ruled that since the assessee was storing the commodities in question in its godowns as part of its own trading stock, it was not entitled to claim deduction from such margin under section 80P(2)(e). While holding so, the Supreme Court distinguished its earlier decision in CIT v. South Arcot District Co-operative Marketing Society Ltd. [1989] 43 Taxman 328/176 ITR 117 wherein the commission taken by the society in question for storing the stock on behalf of the State Government and returning the same every month was held to be an allowable deduction. The distinction pointed out by the Supreme Court was that in South Arcot District Co-operative Marketing Society Ltd.'s case (supra), there were tw....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....acilities to its members, it earns interest income. As stated above, in this case, interest held as ineligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) is not in respect of interest received from members. In this case, we are only concerned with interest which accrues on funds not required immediately by the assessee(s) for its business purposes and which have been only invested in specified securities as 'investment'. Further, as stated above, the assessee(s) markets the agricultural produce of its members. It retains the sale proceeds in many cases. It is this 'retained amount' which was payable to its members, from whom produce was brought, which was invested in short-term deposits/securities. Such an amount, which was retained by the assessee-society, was a liability and it was shown in the balance-sheet on the liability-side. Therefore, to that extent, such interest income cannot be said to be attributable either to the activity mentioned in section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act or in section 80P(2)(a)(iii)) of the Act." 21. In CIT v. Punjab State Co-operative Federation of Housing Building Societies Ltd. [2011] 11 taxmann.com 448 (Punj. & Har.) a Division Bench of....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..... Thus a line of decisions rendered by various High Courts such as the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, the High Court of Calcutta and the High Court of Gujarat, rendered after the decision of the Supreme Court in Totgar's simply followed the ratio decidendi of Totgars. But, one judgment of this court attempted a distinction and that was in Andhra Pradesh State Co-operative Bank Ltd.'s case (supra). In the said case, the assessee was a co-operative society engaged in the business of banking. The assessee had invested statutory reserves in short-term and long-term deposits and the interest earned thereon was disallowed by the Assessing Officer for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i). The Commissioner partly allowed the appeal holding that the interest income relatable to non-SLR investments would not qualify for exemption. The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee holding that in respect of interest income arising both from SLR securities and from non-SLR securities, deduction was allowable. In an appeal under section 260A to this court, heavy reliance was placed by the Revenue upon the decision of the Supreme Court in Totgar's. But the Division Bench distingui....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....decision of this court in Andhra Pradesh State Co-operative Bank Ltd.'s case (supra) would hold the field. 28. We have carefully considered the above submissions. Before considering the effect of the various decisions cited on both sides, we think it would be ideal to look at the statutory prescription in pure and simple form. As we have indicated earlier, section 80P(2) is actually divided into six parts, categorised under clauses (a), (b), (c), (d), (e) and (f). Each one of these clauses deal with different types of co-operative societies engaged in different types of activities. The benefit made available to each one of them is also different from the other. Therefore, it may be useful to present a tabular form, the six categories of co-operative societies covered by clauses (a) to (f) and the nature and extent of the benefit available to each one of them, as follows: Category of co-op. societies covered by Nature and extent of (a) (1) Co-operative society carrying on the business of banking or providing credit facilities to its members ; (2) Co-op. society engaged in cottage industry ; (3) Co-operative society engaged in marketing of agricultural produce gro....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ed above, it may be clear that the deductions available under clauses (a) to (c) are activity-based. The deduction available under clauses (d) and (e) are investment-based and the deduction under clause (f) is institution-based. To put it differently, (A) to be eligible for deduction under clause (a), the claim should relate to the profits and gains of business attributable to anyone or more of the activities listed in clause (a), (B) to be eligible for deduction under clause (b), the society should be a primary society engaged in supplying milk, oilseeds, fruits, etc. to named institutions, such as, Government, Local Authority, Federal Co-operative Society, or Government Company, (C) to be eligible for deduction under clause (c), the institution must be engaged in activities other than those covered by clauses (a) and (b) subject to the further condition that such profits and gains should not exceed a particular limit, (D) to be eligible for deduction under clause (d), the income should be derived from investments with another co-operative society, (E) to be eligible for deduction under clause (e), the income should be derived from letting of godowns or warehouses, etc. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ying the same income. To accept the stand of the Department would mean that co-operative societies carrying on the activities listed in clauses (i) to (vii), which invest their profits and gains of business either in other co-operative societies or in the construction of godowns and warehouses, may benefit in terms of clause (d) or (e), but the very same societies will not be entitled to any benefit, if they invest the very same funds in banks. Such an understanding of section 80P(2) is impermissible for one simple reason. The benefits under clauses (d) and (e) are available in general to all co-operative societies, including societies engaged in the activities listed in clause (a). Section 80P (2) is not intended to place all types of co-operative societies on the same pedestal. The section confers different types of benefits to different types of societies. Special types of societies are conferred a special benefit. 34. The case before the Supreme Court in Totgar's Co-operative Sale Society Ltd.'s case (supra) was in respect of a co operative credit society, which was also marketing the agricultural produce of its members. As seen from the facts disclosed in the decisio....