Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1994 (7) TMI 24

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ing disposed of by this common order and for the disposal of these cases, the facts of the case of Manoj Textiles v. CIT (D.B.I.T. Reference No. 65 of 1989) are being taken up. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has referred the following question of law arising out of its order in respect of the assessment year 1981-82 under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961: " Whether, on the facts and....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y it. It was further said that: " The RIICO in the alternative could have left the development to be made by the assessee himself. In that event, the expenditure so incurred by the assessee would be definitely capital in nature though the land is a leasehold land. Therefore, what the assessee had paid for is such expenditure on development of the land which otherwise would have been incurred by h....