2019 (8) TMI 341
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....- TMI<br>KERALA HIGH COURT - HC<br>Dated:- 1-8-2019<br>WP(C). No. 20864 of 2019 - -<br>GST<br>MR S. V. BHATTI, J. For The Petitioner : ADV. SRI. C. K. SREEJITH For The Respondents : GP, DR. THUSHARA JAMES ASGI, SRI. P. VIJAYAKUMAR JUDGMENT The petitioner challenges Exts.P10, P11 and P12 notices issued by the 1st respondent as illegal and without jurisdiction. Ext.P9 is an order of detention m....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he omission is that admittedly at the time of inspection or detention of goods the transporter could not produce all the documents required for establishing that the goods is under valid transit. The detention order cannot and could not be treated as final, for according to her section 129 deals with and provides for not only detention but also for release of goods, subject to the petitioner compl....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t substantial commission by the banker and for no reason the petitioner loses in the bargain. 4. I have considered the rival submissions and perused the record. The writ petition is disposed of by this order. 5. The issues raised are at preliminary stage and this Court is not convinced to entertain the writ petition and adjudicate upon merits at this stage. To confirm to the scheme under the A....