TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2016 (2) TMI 1243
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....n the reason recorded the AO did conducted any examination or verification from the assessment records to form a prima facie believe to assume valid jurisdiction for action and notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short the Act). The Ld. Counsel vehemently pointed out that the AO proceeded to take action u/s 147/148 of the Act in a mechanical manner and without application of mind to the details received from AR data. The Ld. Counsel has also placed his reliance on the various decisions including decision of Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court of Delhi in the case of CIT vs. G & G Pharma dated 8.10.2015 in ITA no. 545/2015. 4. Replying to the above the Ld. DR supported the action of the AO and contended that the assessee incurred huge expenditure through credit card during relevant period and hence, the AO rightly formed no valid opinion and he had reason to believe that income has escaped assessemtn for this period pertains to huge expenses incurred through credit card. 5. On careful consideration of above rival submissions of both the sides at the outset, we find it appropriate to reproduced impugned reasons recorded by the AO, which reads as follows : "INCOME TAX ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....to Mr. Sawhney, in similar circumstances, the appeal of the Revenue was allowed and the matter was remanded to the ITAT for examination of the case on merits. He also relied upon the decision of the Supreme Court in Phool Chand Bajrang Lal v. Income-tax Officer (1993) 203 ITR 456 SC. The main thrust of the submission of Mr. Sawhney is that, as was in the case of India Terminal Connector System (supra), in the present case as well, there was specific information regarding the name of the entry provider, the date on which the entry was taken, the cheque details as well as the amount credited to the account of the Assessee. He accordingly submitted that this by itself constituted sufficient material for the AO to form an opinion that the "assessee company has introduced his own unaccounted money in its bank account by way of accommodation entries". 8. Mr. Kapil Goel, learned counsel for the Assessee, placed reliance on other decisions of this Court including CIT v. Pradeep Kumar Gupta (2008) 303 ITR 95; the decision dated 27th March 2015 in W.P.(C) No. 5330 of 2014 (Krown Agro Foods Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT); the decision dated 4th August 2015 in ITA No. 486 of 2015 (CIT v. Shri Govind Kr....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....147 of the IT Act, 1961. The AO has to apply his mind to the information, if any, collected and must form a belief thereon. In the circumstances, there is no merit in the civil appeal. The Department was not entitled to reopen the assessment." 11. The above basic requirement of Sections 147/148 has been reiterated in numerous decisions of the Supreme Court and this Court. Recently, this Court rendered a decision dated 22nd September 2015 in ITA No. 356 of 2013 (Commissioner of Income Tax II v. Multiplex Trading and Industrial Co. Ltd.) where the assessment was sought to be reopened beyond the period of four years. This Court considered the decision of the Supreme Court in Phool Chand Bajrang Lal v. Income-tax Officer (supra) as well as the decision of this Court in M/s Haryana Acrylic Manufacturing Co. (P) Ltd. v. CIT 308 ITR 38 (Del). The Court noted that a material change had been brought about to Section 147 of the Act with effect from 1st April 1989 and observed: "29. It is at once seen that the Amendment in Section 147 of the Act brought about a material change in law w.e.f. 1st April, 1989. Section 147(a) as it stood prior to 1st April 1989 required the AO to have a reason....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the manner in which those very entries were provided in the accounts of the Assessee, which must have been tendered along with the return, which was filed on 14th November 2004 and was processed under Section 143(3) of the Act. Without forming a prima facie opinion, on the basis of such material, it was not possible for the AO to have simply concluded: "it is evident that the assessee company has introduced its own unaccounted money in its bank by way of accommodation entries". In the considered view of the Court, in light of the law explained with sufficient clarity by the Supreme Court in the decisions discussed hereinbefore, the basic requirement that the AO must apply his mind to the materials in order to have reasons to believe that the income of the Assessee escaped assessment is missing in the present case. 13. Mr. Sawhney took the Court through the order of the CIT(A) to show how the CIT (A) discussed the materials produced during the hearing of the appeal. The Court would like to observe that this is in the nature of a post mortem exercise after the event of reopening of the assessment has taken place. While the CIT may have proceeded on the basis that the reopening of....