2015 (4) TMI 1271
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....wati Sadan, S.D. Marg, Alwar for the A.Y. 2005-06:- 1. That the Commissioner of Wealth Tax (Appeals), Alwar has erred in law as well as on the facts and circumstances of the case in deleting the addition of Rs. 5,71,54,963/- made by Assessing Officer on account of property at Raniwala Mill. 2. That the Commissioner of Wealth Tax (Appeals), Alwar has erred in law as well as on the facts and circumstances of the case in deleting the addition of Rs. 20,33,588/- made by Assessing Officer on account of property at Mangal Marg, Alwar. 3. That the Commissioner of Wealth Tax (Appeals), Alwar has erred in law as well as on the facts and circumstances of the case in deleting the addition of Rs. 7,00,000/- made by Assessing Officer on a....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..... Value of Property at Rishikesh Rs. 7,00,000/- 4. Value of property at Station road, Alwar Rs. 3,03,62,750/- 5. Value of property at Kush Marg, Alwar Rs. 40,66,000/- 6. Value of property at Naglikhora, Alwar Rs. 6,74,50,000/- Total Rs. 16,96,58,928/- Total wealth rounded off Rs. 16,96,58,928/- 3. Being aggrieved by the order of the Assessing Officer, the assessee carried the matter before the learned CWT(A), who had allowed the appeal partly and held that all the six properties are not....