2019 (7) TMI 1184

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....: D.M. MISRA None present for the Appellant. Heard the learned A.R. for the Revenue. 2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the Appellants are engaged in the manufacture of Sugar from sugarcane. During the course of manufacture of sugar, Bagasse emerges as a by-product/waste. The Appellants had cleared the Bagasse as waste/residue which emerges during the course of manufacture of f....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Rules, 2004. In support, they have referred to the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of UOI Vs DSCL Sugar Limited - 2015 (322) ELT 769 (SC). 3. The learned A.R. reiterates the findings of the learned Commissioner (Appeals). 4. I have carefully considered the submissions and perused the records. I find that the issue has been considered by this Tribunal in the case of Athani ....