TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2019 (7) TMI 1122
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tioner. Mr. Vasonpal, Special Counsel, a/w. Shruti D. Vyas, 'B' Panel Counsel, for the Respondent State. P.C:. On 3 May 2019, we passed the following order: "1. The petitioner has challenged an order of assessment passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax imposing tax on the petitioner to the tune of Rs. 159/Crores (rounded off). The petitioner has raised multiple grounds to ch....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....decision, we would like to hear the respondents. Let the respondents file reply before the next date of hearing. 3. S.O to 14th June, 2019. By way of ad-interim relief, it is provided that there should be no recovery pursuant to the impugned order of the assessment." 2. From the above, it is evident that the following three issues had not been considered by the Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ading to incorrect classification and rate of tax being attracted. 3. We find that the impugned order dated 28 February 2018 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax does not examine much less discuss any of the above or any issues incidental thereto. In the aforesaid circumstances, it is evident that the aforesaid submissions which are a part of the Petitioner's written submissions dat....