Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1995 (2) TMI 39

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e assessee claimed development rebate at 25 per cent. which was allowed by the Income-tax Officer initially. Subsequently, proceedings under section 154 were initiated on the ground that the assessee was doing oil production work by installing oil expellers and, therefore, in accordance with entry 31 of Schedule V to the Act, the assessee is not entitled for development rebate at 25 per cent. The assessee was given an opportunity to show cause as to why the development rebate should not be withdrawn. The assessee submitted in writing that the product of the assessee is covered by item 31 of Schedule V to the Income-tax Act and it was also stated that the manufacturing of vegetable oil and oil cakes does also involve processing of seeds. The....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....at the item falls in entry 31 of the Fifth Schedule is concerned, it is not supported by anything on record. The entry itself mentions that vegetable oil and oilcakes should be manufactured by the solvent-extraction process. If the said items are manufactured by a process other than the solvent-extraction process, then special development rebate of 25 per cent. is not applicable. In respect of the other entry 28, the Tribunal has not given a definite conclusion that the product falls within that item or not and has proceeded on the assumption that the difference between processed seeds and the product manufactured by the assessee has not been stated. It is necessary to refer to the provisions of section 33 of the Act which provide for devel....