Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1995 (2) TMI 37

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... is an application by the Revenue under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee is a partner in two firms. From out of his income from the firms, he claimed deduction of a sum of Rs. 50,000. That claim was upheld by the Income-tax Officer. However, under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, the Commissioner of Income-tax directed the Income-tax Officer to delete the deductions and a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....imself carrying on any profession, the deduction under section 35CCA is not available to him. This contention has been met by the Tribunal holding that the word " assessee " defined in section 2(7) of the Income-tax Act means a person by whom any tax or any other sum of money is payable and that by no stretch of imagination it could be contended that the partner of a firm did not fulfil this condi....