2019 (7) TMI 906

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....efund claim Amount (Rs) Date of filing 1 April 2012 to June 2012 5,53,894 18.03.2013 2 July 2012 to Sept 2012 5,58,015 18.06.2013 3 Oct. 2012 to Dec. 2012 8,86,135 24.09.2013   Total 19,98,044   3. Appellant is a 100% EOU, exporting their services and is registered with the Department under the category of Banking and Other Financial Services, Real Estate Agent etc. As they are exporting their services, they are unable to utilise the CENVAT Credit taken on input services. Accordingly being entitled, the Appellant applied for refund as above mentioned. Pursuant to filing of refund applications, show cause notice was issued alleging that it appears that the services of identif....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the show cause notice, by observing that while going through the Foreign Inward Remittance Certificates (FIRC), it is observed that it is mentioned in FIRC that the same is for part payment of management fees, which is totally different from the services provided by the Assessee (i.e. services under category of Banking and Financial Services). They have not provided the details of actual description of services and manner of providing services said to have been exported so as to decide that the services provided have been actually exported in accordance with Rule 6A of Service Tax Rules, 1994. 5. Being aggrieved the Appellant preferred an appeal before Commissioner (Appeals) who in the impugned order was pleased to hold that Rule 9 of th....