Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1994 (1) TMI 10

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 (sic), praying to call for a statement of facts on the question of law sought to be referred to this court as suggested by the assessee. Being dissatisfied with the order passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Gauhati Bench, Gauhati, rejecting the reference applications filed by the assessee and in refusing to state the case and refer B the question of law as su....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ome-tax Appellate Tribunal, Gauhati Bench, Gauhati, rejecting the prayer for reference and on a perusal of the same, we find that although the learned Tribunal held that the question of law proposed by the assessee is in fact a question of law it refused to refer the said question for the esteemed opinion of this court on the ground that the said question is covered by a decision of the apex court....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... in Ashok Kumar Ratanchand v. CIT [1990] 186 ITR 475 drawing our specific attention to a passage of the aforesaid decision at page 489 to bring home his contention that the issue in hand is not squarely covered by the decision of the apex court in [1975] 101 ITR 776. We have given our anxious consideration to the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and we are of the opinion that t....