Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1995 (11) TMI 89

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ioner of Income-tax, Bhopal, has filed this reference application under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, seeking direction to the Tribunal to state the case and refer the questions of law as proposed. The questions of law are extracted below : "1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is justified in law in holding that no remission or cessation of li....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e price inclusive of excise duty and sales tax will be the liability or benefit of the party implying thereby that the burden of increase as well the benefit of any decrease in the rate of sales tax will go to the MPEB. The Hindustan Aluminium Corporation challenged the rate of tax on the ground that the Central sales tax on the productions in question was leviable at 2 per cent. only. The Corpora....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....then came to this court under section 256(2) of the Act at the instance of the Commissioner of Income-tax. This court rejected the reference on September 19, 1984, on the conclusion that it was a pure question of fact. In the year of assessment 1983-84, the Income-tax Officer again sought to tax the amount holding that the MPEB has not chosen to claim the amount even after the expiry of three year....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....fore this court under section 256(2) of the Act. We have heard Shri D. D. Vyas, learned counsel for the Department and Shri G. M. Chaphekar, learned senior counsel with Shri Subhash Samvatsar for the assessee. The attempt of the Department to augment the amount of income to the extent of refund of Rs. 2,53,185 of the assessment year 1980-81 did not succeed and this court refused to answer the re....