Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (7) TMI 634

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hri NN Prabhudesai, Superintendent (AR) for the respondent ORDER PER: C J MATHEW Learned Counsel for appellant informs that the plea in this appeal against order-in-appeal no. YDB/243/M-II/2010 dated 14th May 2010 of Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai Zone - II is limited to the discharge of the show cause notice on the ground that the impugned order, and that of the origina....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... had, in Elgi Polytex Ltd v. Collector of Central Excise, Coimbatore [1988 (34) ELT 404 (Tribunal)], approved classification under heading no. 3506 00 of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and found approval of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, he contends, by relying on the decision of the Tribunal in Pepsico India Holding Pvt Ltd v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune - III, [or....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ned finality which led the competent authority, vide order dated 15th March 1999, to approve classification under heading no. 3506 00 of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and that the upholding of this by the first appellate authority, upon contest by Commissioner of Central Excise, was sustained by the Tribunal in accordance with the decision in re Elgi Polytex Pvt Ltd. It....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....-work the demand of duty for recovery of the differential amount. As the classification has since been settled and the re-working of the differential duty thereof on the RT-12, filed for the relevant period, is a mandatory consequence, we find that the original authority has merely utilized the proceedings arising out of the show cause notice to issue directions for compliance with the orders of t....