Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (7) TMI 534

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....raised in these appeals, we are, therefore, proceedings to dispose them off by this consolidated order for the sake of convenience. 2. ITA No.2333/PUN/2016 is an appeal by the Revenue in the case of Faurecia Automotive Holding against the order passed by the ld. CIT(A)-13, Pune dated 07-07-2016 deleting penalty of Rs. 26,67,220/- imposed by the Assessing Officer u/s.271(1)(c) r.w.s. 144C(13) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called 'the Act') in relation to the assessment year 2011-12. 3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the AO passed the assessment order making two additions, viz., (1) Reimbursement of salary paid to expatriate Mr. Franck Euvrard treated as Fees for technical services; and (2) Receipt of IT suppo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cia Technology Center India Pvt. Ltd. towards part of salary paid by it to the expatriate Mr. Franck Euvrard in France, which was treated by the AO as "Fees for technical services" (FTS) and included in the total income. 8. Having heard both the sides and gone through the relevant material on record, it is found as an admitted position from the rival sides that the facts and circumstances of this ground are mutatis mutandis similar to those for the A.Y. 2011-12. Following the view taken for the A.Y. 2011-12, we order to delete the addition. This ground is, therefore, allowed. 9. The assessee has raised an additional ground in respect of taxation of IT support services fees received from Faurecia India as Royalty as well as FTS. The as....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....T support services, which was claimed as not chargeable to tax. The AO examined the nature of services and held the same to be income from Royalty/FTS. He, therefore, added Rs. 3,24,83,500/- in the total income of the assessee, against which the assessee has approached the Tribunal. 16. We have heard both the sides gone through the relevant material on record. It is observed from the "Costs Allocation Agreement" between the assessee and Faurecia Technology Center India Pvt. Ltd., whose copy has been placed at page 178 onwards of the paper book that the assessee, a resident of France, rendered services to the Indian entity which have been narrated in Exhibit-1 of the agreement reading as under : "The service provider assists the ....