Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (7) TMI 276

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sposed of. 3. This writ petition turns on a very narrow compass. 4. Writ petition arises under the 'Central Sales Tax Act, 1956' ['CST Act' for the sake of brevity] and the Rules thereunder being the 'Central Sales Tax Rules, 1957' ['said rules' for the sake of brevity]. 5. The relevant assessment year is 2006-2007. 6. The short point is that the writ petitioner, who is a dealer under CST Act and said rules is entitled to concessional rate of tax, if 'C' Forms are produced. 7. The respondent has passed an order dated 26.02.2019, determining a taxable turnover for aforesaid assessment year i.e., 2006-2007 at little over Rs. 4,76,75,337/-. What is of importance is, the respondent has held....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r's response / reply dated 03.11.2015 shows that the same has been duly received by the respondent namely Commercial Tax officer, Nungambakkam Assessment Circle, Chennai - 600 031. 12. In the reply, writ petitioner has pointed out that owing to heavy rain, there was water logging and there was some difficulty in producing the C Forms immediately. On this basis, some time was sought. 13. Learned counsel for writ petitioner, pointed out that there was deluge and floods in November-December 2015 and this Nature's fury is common in knowledge. 14. Learned counsel submits that, thereafter, almost four years later, on 10.08.2018, the respondent sent one more communication, calling for objections and it is for this communication th....