Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (4) TMI 1721

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....al against the judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench dated 31st August 2017 raising following questions of law : [1] "Whether the order of the Appellate Tribunal cancelling the order of CIT under Section 268 of the Act is per verse as it has relied on irrelevant material and ignored relevant material and by assuming wrong fact that the AO had fully examined the impounde....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....urt in the case of Malabar Industrial Co. Limited [243 ITR 83] ?" As can be seen from the questions framed, the issue pertains to exercise of power by the Commissioner under Section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ["the Act" for short] revising the order of the Assessing Officer. Assessee is a developer of real estate and was subjected to search operations, during which certain unaccounted inc....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d judgment, reversed the order of Commissioner. In such judgment, the Tribunal observed that in the order of assessment, the Assessing Officer had raised multiple queries calling upon the assessee's response. The Tribunal was of the opinion that the Assessing Officer had carried out detailed inquiries. The Commissioner was incorrect in holding that no inquiries were carried out. The revisional pow....