Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (6) TMI 597

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ent : Shri. Mathivannan, C. A. ORDER PER INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER This is an appeal filed by the Assessee directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-7, Chennai ('CIT(A)' for short) dated 23.08.2018 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2013 -2014. 2. The Assessee raised the following grounds of appeal: 1. 'The order of the C.l.T Appeals is against the Princip....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....llant is to be annulled on the basis of Consistency. 6. The C.I.T Appeals (7) and the A.O have assessed a sum of Rs. 16,59,818/- as net profit not offered. This is totally disputed as the Proforma Land Account for A.Y 2013-14 submitted showed a net loss of Rs. 8,40,182/- and not profit. Further the transactions on the POA Land business as per the Audited Balance Sheet shows a credit balance of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of income, the assessment was completed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Non Corporate Circle 7(1), Chennai (herein after referred as ''AO') vide order dated 31.03.2016 passed u/s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') at total income of Rs. 1,78,43,133/-. During the course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer found that assessee had sold a property ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... was preferred before ld. CIT(A), who vide impugned order confirmed the additions in respect of sale of property, discount, development expenditure, commission paid and deleted the addition made u/s.14A of the Act. 5. Aggrieved by the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), assessee is in appeal before us. It is contended that the profit cannot be brought to tax since the property....