Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (6) TMI 548

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....R. BHAGYADEVI, TECHNICAL MEMBER, SH. AMAND SHAH, TECHNICAL MEMBER Present: - None for the Applicant No. 1. Rana Ashok Rajneesh, Assistant Commissioner, DG Anti-Profiteering for the Applicant No. 2. Order 1. The present report dated 29.03.2019 has been received from the Directorate General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Servic....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ssed by the Respondent. The only allegation was that the Respondent had charged extra VAT, EDC and IDC during the pre- GST period, i.e. in the period before 01.07.2017. 4. The DGAP has reported that when the Applicant No. 1 was asked to provide more details, he vide his e-mail dated 28.03.2019 had submitted that the matter related to the pre-GST period. The DGAP has also reported that the website....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....licant No. 1 was given two opportunities to defend his complaint, on 22.04.2019 and 08.05.0219, but no one appeared on his behalf on the above dates. Further, the Postal Authorities have informed this Authority that the Applicant No. 1 had in fact refused to accept the Notice for hearing. 7. We have carefully considered the Report of the DGAP and the documents placed on record and find that the o....