2019 (6) TMI 547

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....(a) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the ITAT was justified in holding that tax was deductible from payment of outsourcing expenses such as processing charges, call centre operations and business services etc. under section 194C instead of section 194J of the Act without appreciating that the nature of services received by the assessee requires certain parameters of technical/managerial skill of highly specialized competency and falls within the purview of section 194J of the Act and not 194C of the Act? (b) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the ITAT was justified in holding that tax was deductible from payment of data storage charges under the head outsourcing expen....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd b pertain to a deduction of tax at source on the payment of outsourcing expenses. The assessee had deducted tax under Section 194C of the Act. The revenue argues that the same ought to have been under Section 194J of the Act since payments were for managerial and technical services. 4. The CIT (Appeals) and the Tribunal examined the nature of expenditure and came to the conclusion that the assessee had hired the services for various works such as storage of data, scanning of documents, processing charges, call centre operations etc. Looking to the nature of services outsourced, it was held that the same were basically clerical services of repetative nature of work and payments were therefore, neither for managerial nor for technical ser....